400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11665044)
1. Legal issues of the new reproductive technologies.
Kinney LH
Calif State Bar J; 1977; 52(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 11665044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation.
Lorio KV
LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Civil law regulation of reproductive technologies: new laws for the new biology?
Bercovitch J
Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):385-406. PubMed ID: 11651095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A time to be born, a time to die: alternative reproduction and Texas probate law.
Heard LD
St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):927-63. PubMed ID: 11652490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Man-made man and the law.
Tuchler DJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1978; 22(2):310-25. PubMed ID: 11664955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right of abortion in surrogate motherhood arrangements.
D'Aversa CY
North Ill Univ Law Rev; 1987; 7(1):1-39. PubMed ID: 11658910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
Abbas J
Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: legal issues.
Field M
Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1589-98. PubMed ID: 11653381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial human reproduction: legal problems presented by the test tube baby.
Steeves SM
Emory Law J; 1979; 28(4):1045-79. PubMed ID: 11665235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: fertile areas for litigation.
Lorio KV
Southwest Law J; 1982 Feb; 35(5):973-1011. PubMed ID: 11658618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal aspects of human and genetic engineering.
Rozovsky LE
Manit Law J; 1975; 6(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 11662232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of legal parentage in egg donation, embryo transplantation, and gestational surrogacy arrangements.
Goodwin A
Fam Law Q; 1992; 26(3):275-91. PubMed ID: 11659602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reconceiving privacy: relationships and reproductive technology.
Rao R
UCLA Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 45(4):1077-123. PubMed ID: 11660817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Draft ABA Model Surrogacy Act.
American Bar Association. Section of Family Law, Adoption Committee, and Ad Hoc Surrogacy Committee
Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):123-43. PubMed ID: 11659040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificially assisted conception.
Long LL
Health Law Can; 1985; 5(4):89-107. PubMed ID: 11645666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Artificial procreation, societal reconceptions: legal insight from France.
Jones DJ
Am J Comp Law; 1988; 36(3):525-45. PubMed ID: 11659138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Jewish views of hi-tech birth.
Berenbaum M
Moment; 1987 Nov; 12(6):16-21. PubMed ID: 11658899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice.
Schenker JG; Frenkel DA
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The challenges of new reproductive technologies for Jewish ethics.
Newman LE
Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1651-62. PubMed ID: 11653385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The ectogenetic human being: a problem child of our time.
Dickens BM
Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1979 Winter 1979-80; 18(1):241-67. PubMed ID: 11665167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
