These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11665078)
1. Parental liability for prenatal injury. Simon CA Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1978; 14(1):47-92. PubMed ID: 11665078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Recovery for prenatal injuries: the right of a child against its mother. Chernaik BI Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1976; 10(3):582-609. PubMed ID: 11664595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Maternal substance abuse: the need to provide legal protection for the fetus. Balisy SS South Calif Law Rev; 1987 May; 60(4):1209-38. PubMed ID: 11658941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Torts--negligence--child has cause of action for preconception medical malpractice. Ey DW Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1978 Jan; 31(1):218-26. PubMed ID: 11664876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Defining the boundaries of personal privacy: is there a paternal interest in compelling therapeutic fetal surgery? Blickenstaff DC Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1994; 88(3):1157-99. PubMed ID: 11656414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A new crime, fetal neglect: state intervention to protect the unborn--protection at what cost? Manson R; Marolt J Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):161-82. PubMed ID: 11650070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Parental liability for preconception negligence: do parents owe a legal duty to their potential children? Carroll DE Calif West Law Rev; 1986; 22(2):289-316. PubMed ID: 11659095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mothers as plaintiffs in prenatal tort liability cases: recovery for physical and emotional damages. Bernier BL Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):43-71. PubMed ID: 11649448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights? Gallagher J Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Tort liability for preconception injuries. Marketos JL Annu Surv Am Law; 1978; 1():69-89. PubMed ID: 11665202 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mama vs. fetus. Hornick HL Med Trial Tech Q; 1993; 39(4):536-69. PubMed ID: 11659785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Protecting fetuses from prenatal hazards: whose crimes? what punishment? Nolan K Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 11650907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Adventures in babysitting: gestational surrogate mother tort liability. Bussel KA Duke Law J; 1991 Dec; 41(3):661-90. PubMed ID: 11659580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The maternal abdominal wall: a fortress against fetal health care? Phelan JP South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):461-90. PubMed ID: 11645842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal surgery: a developing legal dilemma. Rauscher K St Louis Univ Law J; 1987 Sep; 31(3):775-95. PubMed ID: 11658987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical choices during pregnancy: whose decision is it anyway? Goldberg S Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 41(2):591-623. PubMed ID: 11649263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Renslow v. Mennonite Hospital. 8 Aug 1977. Illinois. Supreme Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1977; 367():1250-66. PubMed ID: 12038343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Tort liability for wrongfully causing one to be born. Sarno GG Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1978; 83():15-110. PubMed ID: 12091930 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Common law duties to unborn children. Whitfield A Med Law Rev; 1993 Jan; 1(1):28-52. PubMed ID: 11653233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]