525 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11665104)
1. A wink from the bench: the federal courts and abortion.
Uddo BJ
Tulane Law Rev; 1979 Feb; 53(2):398-464. PubMed ID: 11665104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
Witherspoon JP
St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Implications of the abortion decisions: post Roe and Doe litigation and legislation.
Wasserman R
Columbia Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 74(2):237-68. PubMed ID: 11664412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment.
Hatch OG
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
Kudner KE
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
Pirner RK; Williams LB
Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Supreme Court says spouse, parent can't block abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1976 Aug; 5(4):53-7. PubMed ID: 11664665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortions for minors after Bellotti II: an analysis of state law and a proposal.
Lozano GD
St Marys Law J; 1980; 11(4):946-97. PubMed ID: 11658462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Constitutional law: further guidelines for abortion legislation.
Oklahoma Law Rev; 1976; 29(3):785-8. PubMed ID: 11664737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of state abortion laws enacted since January 1973.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Dec; 4(6):108-13. PubMed ID: 11664490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy.
Chemerinsky E
Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Privacy II: state attempts to regulate abortion.
Prall S
Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):385-427. PubMed ID: 11652657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Beyond the Roe debate: judicial experience with the 1980's "reasonableness" test.
Farber DA; Nowak JE
Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 11659370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis.
Linton PB
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The consent question--parental and spousal consent for abortions.
Davis CD
Tex Hosp; 1976 Sep; 32(9):27-30. PubMed ID: 11664739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy.
Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Parental notification and abortion: a review and recommendation to West Virginia's legislature.
Frame DW
West VA Law Rev; 1983; 85(5):943-68. PubMed ID: 11658585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention.
MacDougal D; Nasser WP
Haw Bar J; 1975; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Which way for judicial imperialism?
Byrn RM
Hum Life Rev; 1977; 3(4):19-35. PubMed ID: 11663790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion rights under state constitutions: fighting the abortion war in the state courts.
Chaput KA
Oregon Law Rev; 1991; 70(3):593-628. PubMed ID: 11659531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
