These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Artificial insemination: problems, policies, and proposals. Carr JE Ala Law Rev; 1973; 26(1):120-62. PubMed ID: 11664270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A medical advancement in search of a legal theory--artificial insemination by donor and the law. Baylson MM Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1987 Feb; 5(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 11658912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Conceiving for cash; is it legal?: a survey of the laws applicable to surrogate motherhood. Taylor S N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1987; 4(Part 2):413-44. PubMed ID: 11650203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Frustrated intentions and binding biology: seeking AID (Artificial Insemination by Donor) in the law. Schiff AR Duke Law J; 1994 Dec; 44(3):524-70. PubMed ID: 11660686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Great expectations or convoluted realities: artificial insemination in flux. Smith GP Fam Law Rev; 1980; 3():37-44. PubMed ID: 11658615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sexuality, privacy and the new biology. Smith GP; Iraola R Marquette Law Rev; 1984; 67(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 11658703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Human artificial insemination and the law in Australia. De Stoop DF Aust Law J; 1976 Jun; 50(6):298-308. PubMed ID: 11664730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Confidentiality and American semen donors. Karow AM Int J Fertil; 1993; 38(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 11659706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Austria: a legal ban on surrogate mothers and fathers? Bernat E; Straka U J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Spring; 31(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 11660068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act. Abbas J Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Artificial insemination by donor: information, communication and regulation. Gibson EL J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 11659440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The "legitimization" of artificial insemination: promise or problem? Knoppers BM Fam Law Rev; 1978 Apr; 1(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 11664957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law. Wadlington W Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Artificial insemination--a model statute. Kamlet LG Clevel State Law Rev; 1975; 24(2):341-55. PubMed ID: 11661196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation. Lorio KV LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial insemination: a legislative remedy. Silvoso JA West State Univ Law Rev; 1975; 3(1):48-73. PubMed ID: 11665047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Single-sex families: the impact of birth innovations upon traditional family notions. Shapiro ED; Schultz L J Fam Law; 1985-1986; 24(2):271-82. PubMed ID: 11659130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Draft ABA Model Surrogacy Act. American Bar Association. Section of Family Law, Adoption Committee, and Ad Hoc Surrogacy Committee Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):123-43. PubMed ID: 11659040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]