These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11665139)

  • 1. Addington v. Texas--standard of proof in civil commitment proceedings--a logical middle ground.
    Ross JJ
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1979; 6(3):597-608. PubMed ID: 11665139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The standard of proof necessary in involuntary civil commitment of the mentally ill.
    Coleman SS
    S D Law Rev; 1980; 25(2):379-91. PubMed ID: 11665199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Civil commitment--due process and the standard of proof.
    Brent DJ
    De Paul Law Rev; 1974; 23(4):1500-11. PubMed ID: 11664498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of Addington v. Texas on involuntary civil commitment.
    Hays JR
    Psychol Rep; 1981 Dec; 65(3 pt. 2):1211-5. PubMed ID: 11659310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Court sets rules for committing mental patients.
    Mintz M
    Washington Post; 1979 May; ():A1+. PubMed ID: 11648760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overt dangerous behavior as a constitutional requirement for involuntary civil commitment of the mentally ill.
    Groethe R
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1977; 44(3):562-93. PubMed ID: 11664853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. o'Connor v. Donaldson: a right to liberty for the nondangerous mentally ill.
    Muller MJ
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1975; 3(2):550-62. PubMed ID: 11664550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Involuntary commitment: the move toward dangerousness.
    Weissbourd R
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1982; 15(1):83-113. PubMed ID: 11658335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals.
    Anderson K
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1976; 6(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 11664777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The rights of mental patients.
    Ellis JW
    Ment Hyg; 1975; 59(3):35. PubMed ID: 11664515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Constitutional law--confinement of nondangerous mentally ill capable of surviving safely in freedom held to violate patient's right to "liberty".
    Hancock GC
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 11664793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. o'Connor v. Donaldson: the death of the quid pro quo argument for a right to treatment?
    Bliss TP
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1975; 24(3):557-71. PubMed ID: 11661275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The standard of proof in civil commitment proceedings in Massachusetts: Superintendent of Worcester State Hospital v. Hagberg.
    Abrashkin WH
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1978 Apr; 1(1):71-99. PubMed ID: 11665185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Constitutional law--right to liberty--involuntary confinement of mental patients.
    Tenn Law Rev; 1976; 43(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 11664691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
    Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "We're only trying to help": the burden and standard of proof in short-term civil commitment.
    Henderson LN
    Stanford Law Rev; 1979 Feb; 31(3):425-55. PubMed ID: 11645397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Police power commitments: towards a legal response to violence among the mentally ill.
    Neff RC
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1982; 13(2):421-61. PubMed ID: 11658796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The right to treatment case--that wasn't.
    Mancilla J
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1976; 30(2):486-98. PubMed ID: 11664663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two Supreme Court rulings provide mentally ill defendants new protections.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
    Grant GM
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.