These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11665155)
21. The doctrine of informed consent--fact or fiction? Markham BB Forum; 1975; 10(3):1073-9. PubMed ID: 11664458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Canterbury v. Spence--the case and a few comments. Murphy WJ Forum; 1976; 11(3):716-26. PubMed ID: 11664620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A doctor's duty to inform--Holland v. Sisters of Saint Joseph of Peace. Heilbrun RO Utah Law Rev; 1974; 1974(4):851-60. PubMed ID: 11664429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Informed consent to medical treatment. Beaty GR; Knapp T Air Force Law Rev; 1977; 19(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 11664825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Malpractice and informed consent--a legal ploy. DeLee ST Int Surg; 1976; 61(6-7):331-2. PubMed ID: 11664601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Consent to elective surgery valid even if doctor didn't warn of known risks. Hodge RL Mercer Law Rev; 1976; 28(1):377-81. PubMed ID: 11664784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Informed consent for urography? Allen RW; Ochsner S Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1977 Aug; 129(2):358-9. PubMed ID: 11664822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The physician's duty to disclose risks of treatment. Lieberman M Bull N Y Acad Med; 1974 Sep; 50(8):943-8. PubMed ID: 4528052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Acceptance of risk by patient said to be "essence" of informed consent for research. Fam Plann Dig; 1973 Jan; 2(1):13. PubMed ID: 11664233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cooper v. Roberts: a "reasonable patient" test for informed consent. Cassidy PS Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1973; 34(3):500-9. PubMed ID: 11664238 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The impact of the Texas Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act on informed consent recovery in medical malpractice litigation. Elliott FW Tex Tech Law Rev; 1979; 10(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 11665221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The lay standard of informed consent: theoretical and practical problems with Maryland's new cause of action. MD Law Rev; 1978; 38(2):320-65. PubMed ID: 11665126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Medical malpractice: informed consent to the locality rule. Karlson HC; Erwin RD Indiana Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 12(4):653-85. PubMed ID: 11665188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Informed consent: some would prefer not to know. Dunbar HS Med World News; 1975 May; 16(10):104. PubMed ID: 11664484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Experimental treatment--part 2. Gravenor CA Can Doct; 1976 Sep; 42(9):28+. PubMed ID: 11664792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Comments on informed consent. Connors PJ; Bianco E Md State Med J; 1978 Sep; 27(9):46-7. PubMed ID: 692169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The decline of "informed consent". Plant ML Wash Lee Law Rev; 1978; 35(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 11665008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Informed consent and medical malpractice: where do we go from here? Scaletta DI Manit Law J; 1980; 10(3):289-99. PubMed ID: 11665138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]