289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11665273)
1. Constitutional law--due process--minor child may be "voluntarily" committed to mental institution by parents or guardian following precommitment approval.
Koller HM
Villanova Law Rev; 1980 Mar; 25(3):537-50. PubMed ID: 11665273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Constitutional law--due process--juveniles committed to state mental hospitals upon application of parents or guardians are not entitled to adversarial hearings.
Secrest LF
Emory Law J; 1980; 29(2):517-62. PubMed ID: 11665263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Constitutional law--due process--civil commitment of children by parents--Parham v. J.R.
Citarella KC
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(4):1001-25. PubMed ID: 11658638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Due process and voluntary commitment by parents of juveniles to mental health facilities.
Hodgeman RB
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1980; 49(1):259-69. PubMed ID: 11658342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Due process for minors "voluntarily" committed to mental institutions: does father know best? Recommendations for Illinois.
Gifford M
South Ill Univ Law J; 1980; 1980(2):171-97. PubMed ID: 12083084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Constitutional law--Fourteenth Amendment--due process--civil commitment--mentally ill and retarded juveniles.
Arena RM
Duquesne Law Rev; 1980; 18(4):969-82. PubMed ID: 11658429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Power, uncertainty, and choice: the voluntary commitment of children--Parham v. J.L.
Simet DP
Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1982 May; 20(1):141-61. PubMed ID: 11658705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Due process rights of minors and parental authority in civil commitment cases.
Gartin E
Mercer Law Rev; 1980; 31(2):617-25. PubMed ID: 11661876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions?
Zenoff EH; Zients AB
George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Constitutional collision course: family autonomy and the rights of minors in voluntary commitment proceedings.
Gallion T
LA Law Rev; 1980; 40(4):985-97. PubMed ID: 11660933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Institutionalization of juveniles: what process is due? Parham v. J.R.
Herbsleb J
Neb Law Rev; 1980; 59(1):190-213. PubMed ID: 11658460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Constitutional law--due process does not require an adversary hearing prior to commitment of children to mental hospitals by their parent or guardian.
Humphrey P
Santa Clara Law Rev; 1980; 20(1):269-75. PubMed ID: 11665162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Civil commitment of minors to mental institutions in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
Hopcroft T
N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1995; 21(2):543-74. PubMed ID: 11660369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Post-Parham remedies: the involuntary commitment of minors in Virginia after Parham v. J.R.
Spaulding WJ
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):695-741. PubMed ID: 11665159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Parham v. J. R.: "voluntary" commitment of minors to mental institutions.
Tiano LV
Am J Law Med; 1980; 6(1):125-49. PubMed ID: 7435506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Involuntary civil commitment: the inadequacy of existing procedural and substantive protections.
Matteson K
UCLA Law Rev; 1981 Apr; 28(4):906-51. PubMed ID: 11658605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The never-never land of mental health law: a review of the legal rights of youth committed by their parents to psychiatric facilities in California.
Hollar SS
Berkeley Womens Law J; 1989-1990; 4(2):300-15. PubMed ID: 11659276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Parental power in the voluntary commitment of children to mental institutions.
Riggert BA
Washburn Law J; 1978; 17(3):595-614. PubMed ID: 11662571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A chance to be heard: an application of Bellotti v. Baird to the civil commitment of minors.
Butler KA
Hastings Law J; 1981 May; 32(5):1285-318. PubMed ID: 11658348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Supreme Court holds that children are not constitutionally entitled to pre-admission hearings prior to placement in psychiatric hospitals.
Walker RL
Clgh Rev; 1979 Nov; 13(6):513-5. PubMed ID: 11665119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
