738 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11665275)
21. The expansion of liability for medical accidents: from negligence to strict liability by way of informed consent.
Meisel A
Neb Law Rev; 1977; 56(1):51-152. PubMed ID: 11664804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Medical malpractice: informed consent to the locality rule.
Karlson HC; Erwin RD
Indiana Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 12(4):653-85. PubMed ID: 11665188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Informed consent: looking for the action.
Riskin LL
Univ Ill Law Forum; 1975; 1975(4):580-611. PubMed ID: 11664566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes.
Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ
Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Informed consent: alternatives for Illinois.
Holmstrom JT
Univ Ill Law Forum; 1973; 1973(4):739-56. PubMed ID: 11664278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A new standard for informed consent in medical malpractice cases--the role of the expert witness.
Kopis WF
St Louis Univ Law J; 1973; 18(2):256-69. PubMed ID: 11664280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Informed consent in Washington: expanded scope of material facts that the physician must disclose to his patient.
Rauzi E
Wash Law Rev; 1980 Jun; 55(3):655-75. PubMed ID: 11665260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Informed dissent: a new corollary to the informed consent doctrine?
Friedman DA
Chic Kent Law Rev; 1981; 57(4):1119-44. PubMed ID: 11658347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Following doctors' orders: informed consent in Australia.
Manderson D
Aust Law J; 1988 Jun; 62(6):430-40. PubMed ID: 11659118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Strict liability and informed consent: "Don't say I didn't tell you so!
Maldonado JE
Akron Law Rev; 1976; 9(4):609-28. PubMed ID: 11664618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Informed consent: a new standard for Texas.
Dalrymple G
St Marys Law J; 1976; 8(3):499-513. PubMed ID: 11664790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Legal issues in determining competence to make treatment decisions.
Benesch K
New Dir Ment Health Serv; 1989; No. 41():97-105. PubMed ID: 11659187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Informed consent in Pennsylvania--the need for a negligence standard.
Heckert L
Villanova Law Rev; 1982 Nov; 28(1):149-72. PubMed ID: 11658467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The doctor, the pharmacist, the patient, and the placebo, or you're not my mother, doctor.
Nielsen JR
Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1989 Nov; 44(6):639-57. PubMed ID: 11659226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis.
Monks SS
Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The decline of "informed consent".
Plant ML
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1978; 35(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 11665008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Autonomy and privacy: protecting patients from their physicians.
Bobinski MA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(2):291-388. PubMed ID: 11659957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. AIDS crisis and the health care community: public concerns triggering questionable private rights of action for emotional harms and legislative response.
Beane D
Mercer Law Rev; 1994; 45(2):633-86. PubMed ID: 11660110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Informed consent: from disclosure to patient participation in medical decisionmaking.
Simpson RE
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 76(1):172-207. PubMed ID: 11658361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Informed consent: the three tests and a modest proposal for the reality of the patient as an individual.
Trichter JG; Lewis PW
South Tex Law J; 1981; 21(2):155-70. PubMed ID: 11658706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
