442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11666112)
1. Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.
DiGiuseppe DL; Aron DC; Payne SM; Snow RJ; Dierker L; Rosenthal GE
Health Serv Res; 2001 Oct; 36(5):959-77. PubMed ID: 11666112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service?
Mahoney SF; Malcoe LH
Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 16128970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparisons of caesarean section rates in Taipei municipal hospitals.
Hsu CC; Shieh GR; Wu CS; Shen HC; Tang CH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 16325330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study.
Tang CH; Wang HI; Hsu CS; Su HW; Chen MJ; Lin HC
BMC Public Health; 2006 Oct; 6():246. PubMed ID: 17029640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationships between in-hospital and 30-day standardized hospital mortality: implications for profiling hospitals.
Rosenthal GE; Baker DW; Norris DG; Way LE; Harper DL; Snow RJ
Health Serv Res; 2000 Mar; 34(7):1449-68. PubMed ID: 10737447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjustment for case mix in comparisons of cesarean delivery rates: university versus community hospitals in Vermont.
Whitsel AI; Capeless EC; Abel DE; Stuart GS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1170-5. PubMed ID: 11084561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of obstetric care and risk-adjusted primary cesarean delivery rates.
Bailit JL; Love TE; Dawson NV
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 194(2):402-7. PubMed ID: 16458637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis, assessment, and presentation of risk-adjusted statewide obstetrical care data: the StORQS II study in Washington State. Statewide Obstetrics Review and Quality System.
Holubkov R; Holt VL; Connell FA; LoGerfo JP
Health Serv Res; 1998 Aug; 33(3 Pt 1):531-48. PubMed ID: 9685121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.
Linton A; Peterson MR
Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of reporting maternal in-hospital diagnoses and intrapartum procedures in Washington State linked birth records.
Lydon-Rochelle MT; Holt VL; Nelson JC; Cárdenas V; Gardella C; Easterling TR; Callaghan WM
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 19(6):460-71. PubMed ID: 16269074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Institutional factors in cesarean delivery rates: policy and research implications.
Lin HC; Xirasagar S
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 103(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 14704256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stability of risk-adjusted primary cesarean delivery rates over time.
Bailit JL; Garrett JM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 190(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 14981380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of Indiana birth certificate data compared to medical records.
Zollinger TW; Przybylski MJ; Gamache RE
Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16039875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors associated with hospital-specific cesarean birth rates.
Newton ER; Higgins CS
J Reprod Med; 1989 Jun; 34(6):407-11. PubMed ID: 2738872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reducing cesarean birth rates with data-driven quality improvement activities.
Main EK
Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):374-83. PubMed ID: 9917479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are physicians changing the way they practise obstetrics?
Ruderman J; Carroll JC; Reid AJ; Murray MA
CMAJ; 1993 Feb; 148(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 8439912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surveillance of cesarean section deliveries, New Jersey, 1999-2004.
Denk CE; Kruse LK; Jain NJ
Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 16948720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect.
Luthy DA; Malmgren JA; Zingheim RW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1511-5. PubMed ID: 15547518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rates of labor induction without medical indication are overestimated when derived from birth certificate data.
Bailit JL;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):269.e1-3. PubMed ID: 20816150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Active management of risk in pregnancy at term in an urban population: an association between a higher induction of labor rate and a lower cesarean delivery rate.
Nicholson JM; Kellar LC; Cronholm PF; Macones GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1516-28. PubMed ID: 15547519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
