These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11668130)

  • 1. Meeting calls for a national body to respond to research misconduct.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 2001 Oct; 323(7318):889. PubMed ID: 11668130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific misconduct in medical research.
    Verma BL; Shukla GD
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1992 Aug; 90(8):222-5. PubMed ID: 1460306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. UK declaration made on research misconduct.
    Horton R
    Lancet; 1999 Nov; 354(9190):1623. PubMed ID: 11658054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Doctors propose panel on research misconduct.
    Klarreich E
    Nature; 2001 Oct; 413(6855):442. PubMed ID: 11586312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Plans for tackling research fraud may not go far enough.
    White C
    BMJ; 2000 Dec; 321(7275):1487. PubMed ID: 11118165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):505. PubMed ID: 11644320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research misconduct.
    Jones R
    Fam Pract; 2002 Apr; 19(2):123-4. PubMed ID: 11906974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The need for a national body for research misconduct. Nothing less will reassure the public.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1686-7. PubMed ID: 9614011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Will the UK cope?
    Horton R
    Lancet; 1997 Jul; 350(9073):234. PubMed ID: 9242798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific misconduct: exaggerated fear but still real and requiring a proportionate response.
    Horton R
    Lancet; 1999 Jul; 354(9172):7-8. PubMed ID: 10406357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Management of research misconduct--in practice.
    Wells FO
    J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 8308473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What's new in research ethics.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1996 Oct; No. 122():13-8. PubMed ID: 11654863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. WHO refers $29m Oxford research project to GMC for misconduct.
    Hawkes N
    BMJ; 2016 Nov; 355():i5971. PubMed ID: 27821388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific misconduct. Ill-defined, redefined.
    Palca J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):4. PubMed ID: 8891701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research bodies try to strengthen the integrity of UK research.
    Torjesen I
    BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2677. PubMed ID: 22496343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The UK Panel of Research Integrity: a missed opportunity.
    Lancet; 2008 Oct; 372(9648):1438. PubMed ID: 18970963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 'Unrealistic' misconduct plans under fire.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 May; 381(6580):263. PubMed ID: 8692255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. UK Panel for Research Integrity: more than a smokescreen.
    Kennedy I
    Lancet; 2008 Nov; 372(9653):1877. PubMed ID: 19041791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Procedure for investigation of research misconduct--active treatment or sham intervention?
    Wilmshurst P
    J R Soc Med; 2008 Nov; 101(11):524-5. PubMed ID: 19029346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Appeals board exonerates Baltimore, Imanishi-Kari.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1996 Jul 24-31; 276(4):266. PubMed ID: 8656524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.