These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11668875)

  • 1. Early and late facemask therapy.
    Yüksel S; Uçem TT; Keykubat A
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Oct; 23(5):559-68. PubMed ID: 11668875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of double-plate appliance/facemask combination and facemask therapy in treating class III malocclusions.
    Gencer D; Kaygisiz E; Yüksel S; Tortop T
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 24913739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modified tandem traction bow appliance compared with facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Tortop T; Kaygisiz E; Gencer D; Yuksel S; Atalay Z
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):642-8. PubMed ID: 24274958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination.
    Nienkemper M; Wilmes B; Pauls A; Drescher D
    Prog Orthod; 2013 May; 14(1):5. PubMed ID: 24325812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment with facemask and removable upper appliance versus modified tandem traction bow appliance: the effects on mandibular space.
    Tortop T; Kaygisiz E; Erkun S; Yuksel S
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 29059295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
    Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of modified and conventional facemask therapies with expansion on dynamic measurement of natural head position in Class III patients.
    Yagci A; Uysal T; Usumez S; Orhan M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e223-31. PubMed ID: 22051500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of face mask and tongue plate on maxillary deficiency in growing patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Showkatbakhsh R; Toumarian L; Jamilian A; Sheibaninia A; Mirkarimi M; Taban T
    J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 40(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 23794693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stability of rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy: a long-term controlled study.
    Masucci C; Franchi L; Defraia E; Mucedero M; Cozza P; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 21967936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Franchi L; Baccetti T; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Nov; 126(5):555-68. PubMed ID: 15520688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facemask therapy with and without expansion.
    Tortop T; Keykubat A; Yuksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 17920499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment effects of a fixed intermaxillary device to correct class II malocclusions in growing patients.
    Heinrichs DA; Shammaa I; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):45. PubMed ID: 25138988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment response to maxillary expansion and protraction.
    Ngan P; Hägg U; Yiu C; Merwin D; Wei SH
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):151-68. PubMed ID: 8670927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
    Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients.
    Kim SJ; Kim KH; Yu HS; Baik HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 24582023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.