These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1166888)
1. Overview: the right to treatment--comments on the law and its impact. Stone AA Am J Psychiatry; 1975 Nov; 132(11):1125-34. PubMed ID: 1166888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future. Wallach S Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Risks of state and private hospital psychiatrists in involuntary hospitalization in re: right to treatment. Sadoff RL Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1976; 3(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 990497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment. Johnson RM; Wehrle-Einhorn RJ Univ Kans Law Rev; 1974; 23(1):188-205. PubMed ID: 11664536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Amicus curiae brief in the Donaldson case. American Psychiatric Association Am J Psychiatry; 1975 Jan; 132(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 11643354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Right to treatment. Cohen I; Cohen NL; Sadoff RL Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1975; 3(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 1231943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Madness, committal and society: psychiatry in the service of the law? Peszke MA Conn Med; 1976 Oct; 40(10):705-6, 708-12. PubMed ID: 975799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry. Appelbaum PS Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):827-35. PubMed ID: 6731630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom. Concemi M Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst. Ferleger D; Scott PM West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients. Belzer I UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Law for the nurse supervisor. Right to psychiatric treatment. Creighton H Superv Nurse; 1976 May; 7(5):70-1. PubMed ID: 1046758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Recent mental health litigation: a critical perspective. Stone AA Am J Psychiatry; 1977 Mar; 134(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 842702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. At law. One flew over the Supreme Court. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 1973926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Kremens v. Bartley: the right to be free. Ferleger D Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1976 Oct; 27(10):708-12. PubMed ID: 976953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patients' rights and the psychiatrist's dilemma. Kopolow LE Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1976; 4(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 1027500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychiatric care and the law of substitute decision-making. Parry J Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1987; 11(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 11658868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question. Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Overview: current trends in mental health law. McGarry AL; Kaplan HA Am J Psychiatry; 1973 Jun; 130(6):621-30. PubMed ID: 4581573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pennhurst, Romeo, and Rogers. The Burger Court and Mental Health Law Reform Litigation. Brant J J Leg Med; 1983 Sep; 4(3):323-48. PubMed ID: 6605401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]