These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11669197)

  • 1. CAP88-PC tritium ingestion model inconsistencies.
    Simpkins AA
    Health Phys; 2001 Nov; 81(5 Suppl):S75-7. PubMed ID: 11669197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dose Comparisons for a Site-specific Representative Person Using the Age-dependent Dose Coefficients in CAP88-PC Version 4.
    Stagich BH; Moore KR; Newton JR; Dixon KL; Jannik GT
    Health Phys; 2017 Apr; 112(4):338-342. PubMed ID: 28234692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Current Center of Site Annual Neshap Dose Modeling at the Savannah River Site with Other Assessment Methods.
    Minter KM; Jannik GT; Stagich BH; Dixon KL; Newton JR
    Health Phys; 2018 Apr; 114(4):408-413. PubMed ID: 29481531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling Considerations for Ingestion Pathway Dose Calculations Using CAP88.
    Stuenkel D
    Health Phys; 2017 Apr; 112(4):343-351. PubMed ID: 28234693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's CAP88 PC Versions 3.0 and 4.0.
    Jannik T; Farfan EB; Dixon K; Newton J; Sailors C; Johnson L; Moore K; Stahman R
    Health Phys; 2015 Aug; 109(2 Suppl 2):S169-75. PubMed ID: 26102326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of radionuclide databases in CAP88 mainframe version 1.0 and Windows-based version 3.0.
    LaBone ED; Farfán EB; Lee PL; Jannik GT; Donnelly EH; Foley TQ
    Health Phys; 2009 Sep; 97(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 19667807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation test for CAP88 predictions of tritium dispersion at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
    Michelotti E; Green A; Whicker J; Eisele W; Fuehne D; McNaughton M
    Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S176-81. PubMed ID: 23803672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of dose results from the Clean Air Act Assessment Package-1988, personal computer (CAP88-PC), version 3 to previous versions.
    Rhoads K; Snyder S; Staven L
    Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S125-39. PubMed ID: 23803666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of CAP88 PC Ver. 3.0 and MAXDOSE dose assessment models involving co-located stack releases at the Savannah River site.
    Farfán E; Jannik GT; Lee P; Powell A
    Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S158-63. PubMed ID: 23803669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between kidney burden and radiation dose from chronic ingestion of U: implications for radiation standards for the public.
    Kocher DC
    Health Phys; 1989 Jul; 57(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 2663782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tritium doses from chronic atmospheric releases: a new approach proposed for regulatory compliance.
    Peterson SR; Davis PA
    Health Phys; 2002 Feb; 82(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 11797894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental radiological surveillance in perspective: the relative importance of environmental media as a function of effluent pathway and radionuclides.
    Denham DH
    Health Phys; 1979 Mar; 36(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 226498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tritium dose overestimates by CAP88-PC.
    Parks BS
    Health Phys; 1999 Feb; 76(2 Suppl):S37-8. PubMed ID: 9930839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of results for the University of Missouri Research Reactor radiological airborne release assessments obtained from PC-based computer programs.
    Rong X; Kutikkad K; Langhorst SM
    Health Phys; 1995 Jun; 68(6):845-50. PubMed ID: 7759266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CAP88-PC Version 4, an updated radionuclide NESHAPS model.
    Wood R; Stuenkel D; Rosnick R
    Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S169-75. PubMed ID: 23803671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Test of CAP88-PC's predicted concentrations of tritium in air at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
    Peterson SR
    Health Phys; 2004 Dec; 87(6):583-95. PubMed ID: 15545765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uncertainty of the tritium dose conversion factor.
    Hamby DM
    Health Phys; 1999 Sep; 77(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 10456500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health Physics Society Comments to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Reform Task Force.
    Ring J; Tupin E; Elder D; Hiatt J; Sheetz M; Kirner N; Little C
    Health Phys; 2018 May; 114(5):507-510. PubMed ID: 29505431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of values of annual limits on intake presented in ICRP 61 and 10 CFR part 20.
    Kearfott KJ; Zhu M
    Health Phys; 1996 Apr; 70(4):552-5. PubMed ID: 8617596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tritium intake by exposure to plastic-case watches.
    Thüler OW
    Health Phys; 1996 Dec; 71(6):970-2. PubMed ID: 8919085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.