These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11669244)
1. Bone cell attachment to dental implants of different surface characteristics. Lumbikanonda N; Sammons R Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):627-36. PubMed ID: 11669244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration. A scanning electron microscopic study. Sammons RL; Lumbikanonda N; Gross M; Cantzler P Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 16307572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation. Sader MS; Balduino A; Soares Gde A; Borojevic R Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):667-75. PubMed ID: 16307573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The initial attachment and subsequent behavior of osteoblastic cells and oral epithelial cells on titanium. Goto T; Yoshinari M; Kobayashi S; Tanaka T Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 15472400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of different titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implant surfaces on phenotypic expression of human bone-derived cells. Knabe C; Howlett CR; Klar F; Zreiqat H J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Oct; 71(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 15368259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of bone sialoprotein and collagen coating on cell attachment to TICER and pure titanium implant surfaces. Graf HL; Stoeva S; Armbruster FP; Neuhaus J; Hilbig H Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):634-40. PubMed ID: 18343095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Osteoblast attachment on titanium disks after laser irradiation. Romanos G; Crespi R; Barone A; Covani U Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):232-6. PubMed ID: 16634493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the titanium Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy with and without plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating on growth and viability of cultured osteoblast-like cells. de Lavos-Valereto IC; Deboni MC; Azambuja N; Marques MM J Periodontol; 2002 Aug; 73(8):900-5. PubMed ID: 12211500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Osteoblast-like cell attachment and proliferation on turned, blasted, and anodized titanium surfaces. Pae A; Kim SS; Kim HS; Woo YH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):475-81. PubMed ID: 21691593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur. Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preliminary comparison of mineralizing multilayer cultures formed by primary fetal bovine mandibular osteoblasts grown on titanium, hydroxyapatite, and glass substrates. Yliheikkilä PK; Masuda T; Ambrose WW; Suggs CA; Felton DA; Cooper LF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 8803341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of biological characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells grown on two different titanium implant surfaces. Wang CY; Zhao BH; Ai HJ; Wang YW Biomed Mater; 2008 Mar; 3(1):015004. PubMed ID: 18458491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Different titanium surfaces modulate the bone phenotype of SaOS-2 osteoblast-like cells. Postiglione L; Di Domenico G; Ramaglia L; di Lauro AE; Di Meglio F; Montagnani S Eur J Histochem; 2004; 48(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 15590412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of TiO2 grit blasted titanium implants on adherent osteoblast gene expression in vitro and in vivo. Guo J; Padilla RJ; Ambrose W; De Kok IJ; Cooper LF Biomaterials; 2007 Dec; 28(36):5418-25. PubMed ID: 17868850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differential response of Staphylococci and osteoblasts to varying titanium surface roughness. Wu Y; Zitelli JP; TenHuisen KS; Yu X; Libera MR Biomaterials; 2011 Feb; 32(4):951-60. PubMed ID: 20974493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of titanium surfaces in cultures of neonatal rat calvarial osteoblast-like cells: an immunohistochemical study. Aybar B; Emes Y; Atalay B; Tanrikulu S; Kaya AS; Işsever H; Ceyhan T; Bilir A Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 19212240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biological responses in osteoblast-like cell line according to thin layer hydroxyapatite coatings on anodized titanium. Sohn SH; Jun HK; Kim CS; Kim KN; Chung SM; Shin SW; Ryu JJ; Kim MK J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):898-911. PubMed ID: 17168932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of enamel matrix proteins on the spreading, proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts cultured on titanium surfaces. Miron RJ; Oates CJ; Molenberg A; Dard M; Hamilton DW Biomaterials; 2010 Jan; 31(3):449-60. PubMed ID: 19819013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro comparison of possibly bioactive titanium implant surfaces. Göransson A; Arvidsson A; Currie F; Franke-Stenport V; Kjellin P; Mustafa K; Sul YT; Wennerberg A J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Mar; 88(4):1037-47. PubMed ID: 18404711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]