497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11669255)
1. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of straight and staggered implant placement configurations.
Itoh H; Caputo AA; Kuroe T; Nakahara H
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Feb; 24(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 14984145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Stress analysis of the staggered and straight placement of implants in the mandibular posterior region under the localized load].
Li Y; Zhou YM; Zhou ZP; Wang X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 42(6):365-7. PubMed ID: 17888256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone.
Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K
J Dent; 2002 Jan; 30(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 11741734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Huang JS; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chang CH; Chen MY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 16117772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of torque (moment) on implant/prosthesis with staggered buccal and lingual offset.
Weinberg LA; Kruger B
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Jun; 16(3):252-65. PubMed ID: 9084311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone stress analysis of various angulations of mesiodistal implants with splinted crowns in the posterior mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study.
Lan TH; Pan CY; Lee HE; Huang HL; Wang CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):763-70. PubMed ID: 20657872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A finite element analysis of tilted versus nontilted implant configurations in the edentulous maxilla.
Bellini CM; Romeo D; Galbusera F; Agliardi E; Pietrabissa R; Zampelis A; Francetti L
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 19418861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone level changes at axial- and non-axial-positioned implants supporting fixed partial dentures. A 5-year retrospective longitudinal study.
Koutouzis T; Wennström JL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):585-90. PubMed ID: 17608740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the effect of the residual bone angulation on implant-supported fixed prosthesis in mandibular posterior edentulism. Part II: 3-D finite element stress analysis.
Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
Implant Dent; 2001; 10(4):238-45. PubMed ID: 11813664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Provisional implants for immediate restoration of partially edentulous jaws: a clinical study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):717-25. PubMed ID: 18807570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
