These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11669255)

  • 21. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant.
    Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Lemonge AC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):675-84. PubMed ID: 14579955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Stegaroiu R; Sato T; Kusakari H; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 9509784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Treatment planning of implants when 3 mandibular posterior teeth are missing: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Chen XY; Zhang CY; Nie EM; Zhang MC
    Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):340-3. PubMed ID: 22814561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Syncrystallization: a technique for temporization of immediately loaded implants with metal-reinforced acrylic resin restorations.
    Degidi M; Gehrke P; Spanel A; Piattelli A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):123-34. PubMed ID: 16919020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
    Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever extensions in mandibular posterior edentulism.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Apr; 29(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 11966968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
    Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Finite element analysis of 2 immediate loading systems in edentulous mandible: rigid and semirigid splinting of implants.
    Teixeira MF; Ramalho SA; de Mattias Sartori IA; Lehmann RB
    Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20147815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis.
    Fazi G; Tellini S; Vangi D; Branchi R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):752-9. PubMed ID: 21841984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bicortically stabilized implant load transfer.
    Jeong CM; Caputo AA; Wylie RS; Son SC; Jeon YC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 12608670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biomechanical rationale for intentionally inclined implants in the posterior mandible using 3D finite element analysis.
    Satoh T; Maeda Y; Komiyama Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 16161737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Chang CH; Hsu JT; Fallgatter AM; Ko CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):551-62. PubMed ID: 17929515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
    Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Functional loads on freestanding and connected implants in three-unit mandibular prostheses opposing complete dentures: an in vivo study.
    Gunne J; Rangert B; Glantz PO; Svensson A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 9197098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of stress induced in peri-implant bone tissue by misfit in multi-implant prosthesis.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
    Dent Mater; 2006 Apr; 22(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 16198407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of bridge design on stress distribution in bone tissues surrounding fixtures of osseointegrated implants in the lower molar region.
    Arataki T; Adachi Y; Kishi M
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1998 Aug; 39(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 9927906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
    Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases.
    Grant BT; Pancko FX; Kraut RA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):713-7. PubMed ID: 19304026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Immediate occlusal loading of Osseotite implants in mandibular edentulous patients: a prospective observational report with 18-month data.
    Drago CJ; Lazzara RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 16681501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.