These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11669267)

  • 21. [Inter-comparison of WPS-TEOM-MOUDI and investigation on particle density].
    Gao J; Zhou Y; Wang J; Wang T; Wang WX
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2007 Sep; 28(9):1929-34. PubMed ID: 17990533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of a portable nephelometer against the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance method for monitoring PM(2.5).
    Karagulian F; Belis CA; Lagler F; Barbiere M; Gerboles M
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Aug; 14(8):2145-53. PubMed ID: 22766850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Semicontinuous PM2.5 and PM10 mass and composition measurements in Lindon, Utah, during winter 2007.
    Hansen JC; Woolwine WR; Bates BL; Clark JM; Kuprov RY; Mukherjee P; Murray JA; Simmons MA; Waite MF; Eatough NL; Eatough DJ; Long R; Grover BD
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Mar; 60(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 20397564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Systematic biases in measured PM10 values with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-approved samplers at Owens Lake, California.
    Ono DM; Hardebeck E; Parker J; Cox BG
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Jul; 50(7):1144-56. PubMed ID: 10939208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Collocated comparisons of continuous and filter-based PM2.5 measurements at Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada.
    Hsu YM; Wang X; Chow JC; Watson JG; Percy KE
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Mar; 66(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 26727574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Air quality measurements from the Fresno Supersite.
    Watson JG; Chow JC; Bowen JL; Lowenthal DH; Hering S; Ouchida P; Oslund W
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Aug; 50(8):1321-34. PubMed ID: 11002595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Adjusting tapered element oscillating microbalance data for comparison with Federal Reference Method PM2.5 measurements in region 5.
    Rizzo M; Scheff PA; Kaldy W
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 May; 53(5):596-607. PubMed ID: 12774993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of real-time instruments used to monitor airborne particulate matter.
    Chung A; Chang DP; Kleeman MJ; Perry KD; Cahill TA; Dutcher D; McDougall EM; Stroud K
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 Jan; 51(1):109-20. PubMed ID: 11218418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Online measurement of PM from residential wood heaters in a dilution tunnel.
    Allen G; Morin B; Ahmadi M; Rector L
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2022 Jul; 72(7):662-678. PubMed ID: 35775661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do associations between airborne particles and daily mortality in Mexico City differ by measurement method, region, or modeling strategy?
    O'Neill MS; Loomis D; Borja Aburto VH; Gold D; Hertz-Picciotto I; Castillejos M
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2004 Nov; 14(6):429-39. PubMed ID: 15026773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Long-term field evaluation of the Plantower PMS low-cost particulate matter sensors.
    Sayahi T; Butterfield A; Kelly KE
    Environ Pollut; 2019 Feb; 245():932-940. PubMed ID: 30682749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bias Sources and Corrections in TEOM Technology.
    Page SJ
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(5):233-42. PubMed ID: 23472888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Thermally induced filter bias in TEOM mass measurement.
    Page SJ; Tuchman DP; Vinson RP
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Jul; 9(7):760-7. PubMed ID: 17607397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Errors in coarse particulate matter mass concentrations and spatiotemporal characteristics when using subtraction estimation methods.
    Clements N; Milford JB; Miller SL; Navidi W; Peel JL; Hannigan MP
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Dec; 63(12):1386-98. PubMed ID: 24558702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of Equilibration Temperature on PM
    Mignacca D; Stubbs K
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 1999 Oct; 49(10):1250-1254. PubMed ID: 28060673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mobile phones as monitors of personal exposure to air pollution: Is this the future?
    Nyarku M; Mazaheri M; Jayaratne R; Dunbabin M; Rahman MM; Uhde E; Morawska L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0193150. PubMed ID: 29474387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Direct-reading inhalable dust monitoring--an assessment of current measurement methods.
    Thorpe A; Walsh PT
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Aug; 57(7):824-41. PubMed ID: 23704135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The collection of PM10 for toxicological investigation: comparisons between different collecting devices.
    Greenwell LL; Jones TP; Richards RJ
    Environ Monit Assess; 2002 Nov; 79(3):251-73. PubMed ID: 12392163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.