These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11669387)

  • 21. Beliefs and attitudes among Swedish workers regarding the risk of hearing loss.
    Svensson EB; Morata TC; Nylén P; Krieg EF; Johnson AC
    Int J Audiol; 2004; 43(10):585-93. PubMed ID: 15724523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Noise exposures. Effects on hearing and prevention of noise induced hearing loss.
    Lusk SL
    AAOHN J; 1997 Aug; 45(8):397-408; quiz 409-10. PubMed ID: 9341314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Personal attenuation ratings versus derated noise reduction ratings for hearing protection devices.
    Murphy WJ; Gong W; Karch SJ; Federman J; Schulz TY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Aug; 152(2):1074. PubMed ID: 36050158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tactics against workplace hearing loss motivate employees to wear protection.
    DeJoy DM
    Occup Health Saf; 1994 Mar; 63(3):50-4. PubMed ID: 9156458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors.
    Savell JF; Toothman EH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jan; 48(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3565259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Individual fit-testing of earplugs: a review of uses.
    Schulz TY
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):152-62. PubMed ID: 21368441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effectiveness verification of an educational program about hearing protection for noise-exposed workers.
    Rocha CH; Santos LH; Moreira RR; Neves-Lobo IF; Samelli AG
    J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol; 2011 Mar; 23(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 21552731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hearing Protector Attenuation and Noise Exposure Among Metal Manufacturing Workers.
    Sayler SK; Rabinowitz PM; Galusha D; Sun K; Neitzel RL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):680-689. PubMed ID: 30157082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Test of the health promotion model as a causal model of construction workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Hogan MM
    Res Nurs Health; 1997 Jun; 20(3):183-94. PubMed ID: 9179173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting use of hearing protection: a preliminary study.
    Lusk SL; Kelemen MJ
    Public Health Nurs; 1993 Sep; 10(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 8234157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hearing loss and perceptions of noise in the workplace among rural Australians.
    Williams W; Purdy S; Murray N; LePage E; Challinor K
    Aust J Rural Health; 2004 Jun; 12(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 15200522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Gender and other factors associated with the use of hearing protection devices at work.
    Meira TC; Santana VS; Ferrite S
    Rev Saude Publica; 2015; 49():. PubMed ID: 26487294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The hearing conservation amendment: 25 years later.
    Suter AH
    Noise Health; 2009; 11(42):2-7. PubMed ID: 19265247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A multi-component intervention to promote hearing protector use among construction workers.
    Seixas NS; Neitzel R; Stover B; Sheppard L; Daniell B; Edelson J; Meischke H
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50 Suppl 1(0 1):S46-56. PubMed ID: 21091403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of a low intensity intervention to increase hearing protector use among noise-exposed workers.
    McCullagh MC
    Am J Ind Med; 2011 Mar; 54(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 20721900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A systematic review of the interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.
    El Dib RP; Atallah AN; Andriolo RB; Soares BG; Verbeek J
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2007 Nov; 125(6):362-9. PubMed ID: 18317609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using the extended parallel process model to prevent noise-induced hearing loss among coal miners in Appalachia.
    Murray-Johnson L; Witte K; Patel D; Orrego V; Zuckerman C; Maxfield AM; Thimons ED
    Health Educ Behav; 2004 Dec; 31(6):741-55. PubMed ID: 15539545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The otolaryngologist and hearing protectors.
    Alberti PW; Riko K
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1984 Nov; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 6514358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Gender differences in use of hearing protection devices among farm operators.
    McCullagh MC; Banerjee T; Yang JJ; Bernick J; Duffy S; Redman R
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(85):368-375. PubMed ID: 27991469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.