These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11669416)

  • 1. Yes sir, that's my data!
    Zatz M
    J Biol Rhythms; 2001 Oct; 16(5):435. PubMed ID: 11669416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. That's my hospital standing right behind me--cringing.
    Med Econ; 1991 Apr; 68(7):42-6. PubMed ID: 10109851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review in medical publishing--how to streamline the system.
    Kochar MS
    Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1984 Oct; 4(9):6. PubMed ID: 10269285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. My very last editorial: and that's a promise.
    Warlow C
    Pract Neurol; 2011 Aug; 11(4):204-5. PubMed ID: 21746705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is anonymous peer review the best way to review and accept manuscripts?
    Altura BT
    Magnes Trace Elem; 1990; 9(3):117-8. PubMed ID: 2248691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The promise and perils of peer review.
    Rohrich RJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Sep; 118(3):795-7. PubMed ID: 16932192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review in health sciences.
    Das T
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 50(2):79. PubMed ID: 12194582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guarding the guardians: a conference on editorial peer review.
    Rennie D
    JAMA; 1986 Nov; 256(17):2391-2. PubMed ID: 3773144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On peer review--the cornerstone of scientific publication.
    Karlberg I
    Scand J Public Health; 2015 Feb; 43(1):1. PubMed ID: 25564518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review.
    Rosenfeld RM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Aug; 137(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 17666237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review and the fate of manuscripts.
    Frey JJ
    Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 3843084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review: universal, but valid?
    Sataloff RT
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2009 Apr; 88(4):848-51. PubMed ID: 19358120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review (continued).
    Nature; 1989 Aug; 340(6235):588. PubMed ID: 2770864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making the most of peer review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2000 Jul; 3(7):629. PubMed ID: 10862686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review and accountability.
    Hardy LK
    Can J Nurs Res; 1991; 23(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 1802369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
    Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
    Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review system in health sciences.
    Thomas R; Parikh R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2003 Mar; 51(1):109-10; author reply 110. PubMed ID: 12701880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flaws documented, reforms debated at congress on journal peer review.
    Cotton P
    JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(23):2775-8. PubMed ID: 8133598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
    Liesegang TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. That's no 'client', that's my relative.
    Sparkes P
    Nurs Stand; 1993 Apr; 7(29):43. PubMed ID: 27658105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.