These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11673100)

  • 1. Evaluating informatics applications--clinical decision support systems literature review.
    Kaplan B
    Int J Med Inform; 2001 Nov; 64(1):15-37. PubMed ID: 11673100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating informatics applications--some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism.
    Kaplan B
    Int J Med Inform; 2001 Nov; 64(1):39-56. PubMed ID: 11673101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computerized Clinical Decision Support: Contributions from 2015.
    Koutkias V; Bouaud J
    Yearb Med Inform; 2016 Nov; (1):170-177. PubMed ID: 27830247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Going digital: a narrative overview of the clinical and organisational impacts of eHealth technologies in hospital practice.
    Keasberry J; Scott IA; Sullivan C; Staib A; Ashby R
    Aust Health Rev; 2017 Dec; 41(6):646-664. PubMed ID: 28063462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A medical informatics perspective on clinical decision support systems. Findings from the yearbook 2013 section on decision support.
    Bouaud J; Lamy JB;
    Yearb Med Inform; 2013; 8():128-31. PubMed ID: 23974560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of pharmacy computerised clinical decision support on prescribing, clinical and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.
    Robertson J; Walkom E; Pearson SA; Hains I; Williamsone M; Newby D
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2010 Apr; 18(2):69-87. PubMed ID: 20441116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical decision support systems at the Vienna General Hospital using Arden Syntax: Design, implementation, and integration.
    Schuh C; de Bruin JS; Seeling W
    Artif Intell Med; 2018 Nov; 92():24-33. PubMed ID: 26706047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems.
    Main C; Moxham T; Wyatt JC; Kay J; Anderson R; Stein K
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Oct; 14(48):1-227. PubMed ID: 21034668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical informatics in the intensive care unit: overview of technology assessment.
    Adhikari N; Lapinsky SE
    J Crit Care; 2003 Mar; 18(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 12640613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multiple-scenario assessment of the effect of a continuous-care, guideline-based decision support system on clinicians' compliance to clinical guidelines.
    Shalom E; Shahar Y; Parmet Y; Lunenfeld E
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Apr; 84(4):248-62. PubMed ID: 25649843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A 2014 medical informatics perspective on clinical decision support systems: do we hit the ceiling of effectiveness?
    Bouaud J; Lamy JB
    Yearb Med Inform; 2014 Aug; 9(1):163-6. PubMed ID: 25123737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A taxonomic description of computer-based clinical decision support systems.
    Berlin A; Sorani M; Sim I
    J Biomed Inform; 2006 Dec; 39(6):656-67. PubMed ID: 16442854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characteristics of outpatient clinical decision support systems: a taxonomic description.
    Berlin A; Sorani M; Sim I
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):578-81. PubMed ID: 15360878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors known to influence acceptance of clinical decision support systems.
    Kilsdonk E; Peute LW; Knijnenburg SL; Jaspers MW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():150-4. PubMed ID: 21893732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CDSS-RM: a clinical decision support system reference model.
    Zikos D; DeLellis N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):137. PubMed ID: 30445910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Executable medical guidelines with Arden Syntax-Applications in dermatology and obstetrics.
    Seitinger A; Rappelsberger A; Leitich H; Binder M; Adlassnig KP
    Artif Intell Med; 2018 Nov; 92():71-81. PubMed ID: 27686851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of electronic medical record-based clinical decision support on HIV care in resource-constrained settings: a systematic review.
    Oluoch T; Santas X; Kwaro D; Were M; Biondich P; Bailey C; Abu-Hanna A; de Keizer N
    Int J Med Inform; 2012 Oct; 81(10):e83-92. PubMed ID: 22921485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects and characteristics of clinical decision support systems on the outcomes of patients with kidney disease: a systematic review.
    Mirpanahi N; Nabovati E; Sharif R; Amirazodi S; Karami M
    Hosp Pract (1995); 2023 Aug; 51(3):110-123. PubMed ID: 37068105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of computerized decision support systems on nursing performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.
    Randell R; Mitchell N; Dowding D; Cullum N; Thompson C
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Oct; 12(4):242-9. PubMed ID: 17925077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.