BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11673734)

  • 1. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
    Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reusable biopsy forceps: a cost-effective measure for the endoscopy suite.
    Raltz SL; Kozarek RA; Pethigal PA; Moorhouse MA; Merriam LD
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 1995; 18(5):167-70. PubMed ID: 7578296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-minimization analysis of jumbo reusable forceps versus disposable forceps in a high-volume ambulatory endoscopy center.
    Hogan RB; Santa-Cruz R; Weeks ES; Alexander L; Hogan RB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Feb; 69(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18725156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective cost evaluation.
    Deprez PH; Horsmans Y; Van Hassel M; Hoang P; Piessevaux H; Geubel A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 10699768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biopsy forceps: disposable or reusable?
    Muscarella LF
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2001; 24(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 11847729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cost and performance evaluation of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy.
    Yang R; Ng S; Nichol M; Laine L
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 10699769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biopsy forceps: reusable or disposable?
    Fireman Z
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Jul; 21(7):1089-92. PubMed ID: 16824057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A performance, safety and cost comparison of reusable and disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Rizzo J; Bernstein D; Gress F
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 10699767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy: a cost-minimization analysis.
    Bourguignon C; Destrumelle AS; Koch S; Grumblat A; Carayon P; Chopard C; Woronoff-Lemsi MC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Aug; 58(2):226-9. PubMed ID: 12872090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective evaluation of cleaning, function, adequacy of tissue specimen, and durability.
    Kozarek RA; Attia FM; Sumida SE; Raltz SL; Roach SK; Schembre DB; Brandabur JJ; Ball TJ; Gluck M; Jiranek GC; Patterson DJ; Bredfeldt JE; Gelfand M; McCormick SE; Drajpuch DB; Moran DK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Jun; 53(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 11375582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps for colorectal epithelial cell proliferation in humans.
    Sandler RS; Cummings MS; Keku TO; Terse A; Mehta N
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Oct; 9(10):1123-5. PubMed ID: 11045798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advantages of disposable endoscopic accessories.
    Petersen BT
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 10683219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of costs for reusable and disposable syringes.
    Yimyam S; Srisuphan W; Plianpadung S; Senaratana W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul; 78 Suppl 1():S26-8. PubMed ID: 7666023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Reusable versus disposable biopsy forceps: an economic comparison].
    Jörgensen E; Busch C; Ujlaky R
    Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Oct; 46(10):1185-7. PubMed ID: 18937187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reusable versus disposable forceps: the dilemma of cost and safety.
    Gordon SJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):363-5. PubMed ID: 10699795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardized reprocessing of reusable colonoscopy biopsy forceps is effective: results of a German multicenter study.
    Jung M; Beilenhoff U; Pietsch M; Kraft B; Rippin G
    Endoscopy; 2003 Mar; 35(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 12584636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multipatient use of prefilled disposable oxygen humidifiers for up to 30 days: patient safety and cost analysis.
    Golar SD; Sutherland LL; Ford GT
    Respir Care; 1993 Apr; 38(4):343-7. PubMed ID: 10145893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reprocessing of reusable medical devices.
    Malchesky PS; Chamberlain VC; Scott-Conner C; Salis B; Wallace C
    ASAIO J; 1995; 41(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 7640417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: comparison with standard forceps of sample size and adequacy of specimen.
    Turk DJ; Kozarek RA; Botoman VA; Patterson DJ; Ball TJ
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 1991 Feb; 13(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 2007750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective evaluation of costs.
    Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Merriam LD; Sumida SE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1996 Jan; 43(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 8903810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.