804 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11673934)
1. Intratester and intertester reliability of the Cybex electronic digital inclinometer (EDI-320) for measurement of active neck flexion and extension in healthy subjects.
Tousignant M; Boucher N; Bourbonnais J; Gravelle T; Quesnel M; Brosseau L
Man Ther; 2001 Nov; 6(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 11673934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of cervical range of motion using the OSI CA 6000 spine motion analyser on asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects.
Petersen CM; Johnson RD; Schuit D
Man Ther; 2000 May; 5(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 10903583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intratester and intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device.
Capuano-Pucci D; Rheault W; Aukai J; Bracke M; Day R; Pastrick M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1991 Apr; 72(5):338-40. PubMed ID: 2009054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of the spin-T cervical goniometer in measuring cervical range of motion in an asymptomatic Indian population.
Agarwal S; Allison GT; Singer KP
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005 Sep; 28(7):487-92. PubMed ID: 16182022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Active lateral neck flexion range of motion measurements obtained with a modified goniometer: reliability and estimates of normal.
Pellecchia GL; Bohannon RW
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998 Sep; 21(7):443-7. PubMed ID: 9777543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standardized initial head position in cervical range-of-motion assessment: reliability and error analysis.
Solinger AB; Chen J; Lantz CA
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Jan; 23(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 10658872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the cervical range of motion over time, differences between results of the Flock of Birds and the EDI-320: a comparison between an electromagnetic tracking system and an electronic inclinometer.
Assink N; Bergman GJ; Knoester B; Winters JC; Dijkstra PU
Man Ther; 2008 Oct; 13(5):450-5. PubMed ID: 17681865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical motion assessment using virtual reality.
Sarig-Bahat H; Weiss PL; Laufer Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1018-24. PubMed ID: 19404177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Zebris versus Myrin: a comparative study between a three-dimensional ultrasound movement analysis and an inclinometer/compass method: intradevice reliability, concurrent validity, intertester comparison, intratester reliability, and intraindividual variability.
Malmström EM; Karlberg M; Melander A; Magnusson M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Nov; 28(21):E433-40. PubMed ID: 14595170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intratester and intertester reliability and criterion validity of the parallelogram and universal goniometers for active knee flexion in healthy subjects.
Brosseau L; Tousignant M; Budd J; Chartier N; Duciaume L; Plamondon S; O'Sullivan JP; O'Donoghue S; Balmer S
Physiother Res Int; 1997; 2(3):150-66. PubMed ID: 9421820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interrater reliability of the Cybex EDI-320 and fluid goniometer in normals and patients with low back pain.
Chiarello CM; Savidge R
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1993 Jan; 74(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 8420517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of shoulder range of motion comparing a goniometer to a digital level.
Mullaney MJ; McHugh MP; Johnson CP; Tyler TF
Physiother Theory Pract; 2010 Jul; 26(5):327-33. PubMed ID: 20557263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability of a single, digital inclinometric range of motion measurement technique in the assessment of lumbar range of motion.
Stude DE; Goertz C; Gallinger M
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 Feb; 17(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 8169547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of neck muscle strength with a modified sphygmomanometer dynamometer: reliability and validity.
Vernon HT; Aker P; Aramenko M; Battershill D; Alepin A; Penner T
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992; 15(6):343-9. PubMed ID: 1431617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility and validity of digital inclinometry for measuring cervical range of motion in normal subjects.
Prushansky T; Deryi O; Jabarreen B
Physiother Res Int; 2010 Mar; 15(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19554615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Annual frequency and magnitude of neck motion in healthy individuals.
Sterling AC; Cobian DG; Anderson PA; Heiderscheit BC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(17):1882-8. PubMed ID: 18670342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Test-retest reliability of cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in three cardinal planes.
Lee HY; Teng CC; Chai HM; Wang SF
Man Ther; 2006 Feb; 11(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 15922647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A reassessment of normal cervical range of motion.
Lantz CA; Klein G; Chen J; Mannion A; Solinger AB; Dvorak J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(12):1249-57. PubMed ID: 12811267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intratester and intertester reliability and validity of measures of innominate bone inclination.
Crowell RD; Cummings GS; Walker JR; Tillman LJ
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1994 Aug; 20(2):88-97. PubMed ID: 7920606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications.
Neblett R; Mayer TG; Gatchel RJ; Keeley J; Proctor T; Anagnostis C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(13):1435-46. PubMed ID: 12838103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
