142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11674835)
21. Dosimetric advantage of using 6 MV over 15 MV photons in conformal therapy of lung cancer: Monte Carlo studies in patient geometries.
Wang L; Yorke E; Desobry G; Chui CS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11818004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Use of Monte Carlo computation in benchmarking radiotherapy treatment planning system algorithms.
Lewis RD; Ryde SJ; Seaby AW; Hancock DA; Evans CJ
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Jul; 45(7):1755-64. PubMed ID: 10943917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in slab phantoms with cortical bone equivalent heterogeneities.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Panettieri V; Weber L; Eudaldo T; Ginjaume M; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3323-33. PubMed ID: 17879796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Commissioning a fast Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for lung cancer treatment planning.
Craig J; Oliver M; Gladwish A; Mulligan M; Chen J; Wong E
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 9(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 18714276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Benchmarking analytical calculations of proton doses in heterogeneous matter.
Ciangaru G; Polf JC; Bues M; Smith AR
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3511-23. PubMed ID: 16475750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dose enhancement in radiotherapy of small lung tumors using inline magnetic fields: A Monte Carlo based planning study.
Oborn BM; Ge Y; Hardcastle N; Metcalfe PE; Keall PJ
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):368. PubMed ID: 26745930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Retrospective monte carlo dose calculations with limited beam weight information.
Lindsay PE; El Naqa I; Hope AJ; Vicic M; Cui J; Bradley JD; Deasy JO
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):334-46. PubMed ID: 17278519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An in-depth Monte Carlo study of lateral electron disequilibrium for small fields in ultra-low density lung: implications for modern radiation therapy.
Disher B; Hajdok G; Gaede S; Battista JJ
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(6):1543-59. PubMed ID: 22391122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validation of the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan for a static and dynamic 6 MV photon beam.
Magaddino V; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Schmidhalter D; Hirschi L; Fix MK
Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 21239148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fast and accurate dose predictions for novel radiotherapy treatments in heterogeneous phantoms using conditional 3D-UNet generative adversarial networks.
Mentzel F; Kröninger K; Lerch M; Nackenhorst O; Paino J; Rosenfeld A; Saraswati A; Tsoi AC; Weingarten J; Hagenbuchner M; Guatelli S
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3389-3404. PubMed ID: 35184310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Experimental evaluation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm in the Monaco treatment planning system.
Paudel MR; Kim A; Sarfehnia A; Ahmad SB; Beachey DJ; Sahgal A; Keller BM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):230-241. PubMed ID: 27929496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dose calculation accuracy of lung planning with a commercial IMRT treatment planning system.
McDermott PN; He T; DeYoung A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(4):341-51. PubMed ID: 14604424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Analysis of the penumbra enlargement in lung versus the quality index of photon beams: a methodology to check the dose calculation algorithm.
Tsiakalos MF; Theodorou K; Kappas C; Zefkili S; Rosenwold JC
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):943-9. PubMed ID: 15125013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A Monte Carlo approach to lung dose calculation in small fields used in intensity modulated radiation therapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Mesbahi A; Dadgar H; Ghareh-Aghaji N; Mohammadzadeh M
J Cancer Res Ther; 2014; 10(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 25579525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
