165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11675280)
1. Putting people to the test.
Weinhold B
Environ Health Perspect; 2001 Oct; 109(10):A482-5. PubMed ID: 11675280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Research ethics review in Australia, Europe and North America.
McNeill PM
IRB; 1989; 11(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 11650207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimizing risk in clinical research.
Federman DD
Ann Intern Med; 2003 Jul; 139(1):71-2. PubMed ID: 12834321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Need for revision to the December 20, 1988 law relative to the protection of persons participating in biomedical research (Huriet's law)].
Arch Pediatr; 2001 Jun; 8(6):634-8. PubMed ID: 11446187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
Beh HG
Law Psychol Rev; 2002; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality-improvement research and informed consent.
Miller FG; Emanuel EJ
N Engl J Med; 2008 Feb; 358(8):765-7. PubMed ID: 18287598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Protecting the "animal of necessity": limits to inquiry in clinical investigation.
Swazey JP
Daedalus; 1978; 107(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 11645787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Human experimentation and medical ethics.
Gutteridge F
Aust Nurses J; 1982 May; 11(10):23-5. PubMed ID: 11643895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Harmonization in the regulation of pharmaceutical research and human rights: the need to think globally.
Dominguez-Urban I
Cornell Int Law J; 1997; 30(2):245-86. PubMed ID: 12194190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Regulating research on the terminally ill: a proposal for heightened safeguards.
Addicott DC
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1999; 15(2):479-524. PubMed ID: 10394764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Nontherapeutic research on subjects unable to grant consent.
Frank S; Agich GJ
Clin Res; 1985 Oct; 33(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 4053504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Protecting research participants while reducing regulatory burdens.
Lo B; Barnes M
JAMA; 2011 Nov; 306(20):2260-1. PubMed ID: 22110108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. University uses "implied informed consent".
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Mar; 20(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 15856566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research involving the newly dead: an institutional response.
DeVita MA; Wicclair M; Swanson D; Valenta C; Schold C; ;
Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5 Suppl):S385-90. PubMed ID: 12771588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical experimentation and the protection of human rights.
World Federation of Associations of Clinical Toxicology Centers and Poison Control Centers
Bull Med Leg Toxicol; 1979; 22(5):623-32. PubMed ID: 11661830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Issues for research ethics committees: third installment.
Evans D; Crossland N; Graham I; Preece A
Bull Med Ethics; 1998 Feb; No. 135():13-6. PubMed ID: 11657246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical research on humans: regulation in Switzerland, the European Union, and the United States.
Schott M
Food Drug Law J; 2005; 60(1):45-77. PubMed ID: 15940854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Educational research--to IRB, or not to IRB?
Miser WF
Fam Med; 2005 Mar; 37(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 15739131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Revamping the US Federal Common Rule: Modernizing Human Participant Research Regulations.
Hodge JG; Gostin LO
JAMA; 2017 Apr; 317(15):1521-1522. PubMed ID: 28241195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
