BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11676099)

  • 1. Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images.
    Bruce V; Henderson Z; Newman C; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Sep; 7(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 11676099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Matching faces to photographs: poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory).
    Megreya AM; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Dec; 14(4):364-72. PubMed ID: 19102619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: a review.
    Johnston RA; Edmonds AJ
    Memory; 2009 Jul; 17(5):577-96. PubMed ID: 19548173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Ewbank MP; Smith WA; Hancock ER; Andrews TJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 17507454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in memory for highly familiar faces of self and friend.
    Brady N; Campbell M; Flaherty M
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Aug; 58(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 15963384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociating face processing skills: decision about lip-read speech, expression, and identity.
    Campbell R; Brooks B; de Haan E; Roberts T
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 May; 49(2):295-314. PubMed ID: 8685385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants.
    Duchaine B; Nakayama K
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):576-85. PubMed ID: 16169565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social and emotional attachment in the neural representation of faces.
    Gobbini MI; Leibenluft E; Santiago N; Haxby JV
    Neuroimage; 2004 Aug; 22(4):1628-35. PubMed ID: 15275919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex.
    Ewbank MP; Andrews TJ
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 40(4):1857-70. PubMed ID: 18343161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biased lineup instructions and face identification from video images.
    Thompson WB; Johnson J
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 18318406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Representations of familiar and unfamiliar faces as revealed by viewpoint-aftereffects.
    Ryu JJ; Chaudhuri A
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(23):4059-63. PubMed ID: 16996559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data.
    Stacey PC; Walker S; Underwood JD
    Br J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 96(Pt 4):407-22. PubMed ID: 16248933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cortical mechanisms of visual self-recognition.
    Sugiura M; Watanabe J; Maeda Y; Matsue Y; Fukuda H; Kawashima R
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 15588605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: evidence against a developmental shift.
    Bonner L; Burton M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):1019-29. PubMed ID: 15370514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Children and adults recall the names of highly familiar faces faster than semantic information.
    Calderwood L; Burton AM
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 97(Pt 4):441-54. PubMed ID: 17018182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How do rhesus monkeys ( Macaca mulatta) scan faces in a visual paired comparison task?
    Gothard KM; Erickson CA; Amaral DG
    Anim Cogn; 2004 Jan; 7(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 14745584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces.
    Cheung OS; Richler JJ; Palmeri TJ; Gauthier I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1327-36. PubMed ID: 19045978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of inversion and eye displacements of familiar and unknown faces on early and late-stage ERPs.
    Caharel S; Fiori N; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 16678927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.