These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11676731)

  • 1. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion.
    Bennell KL; Talbot RC; Wajswelner H; Techovanich W; Kelly DH; Hall AJ
    Aust J Physiother; 1998; 44(3):175-180. PubMed ID: 11676731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Functional Ankle Motion Measures in Modern Dancers.
    Dickson D; Hollman-Gage K; Ojofeitimi S; Bronner S
    J Dance Med Sci; 2012 Sep; 16(3):116-25. PubMed ID: 26730940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The intra and inter-rater reliability of a modified weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion.
    O'Shea S; Grafton K
    Man Ther; 2013 Jun; 18(3):264-8. PubMed ID: 23058447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The iPhone Measure app level function as a measuring device for the weight bearing lunge test in adults: a reliability study.
    Banwell HA; Uden H; Marshall N; Altmann C; Williams CM
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2019; 12():37. PubMed ID: 31333763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reliability and validity of the weight-bearing lunge test in a Congenital Talipes Equinovarus population (CTEV).
    Gosse G; Ward E; McIntyre A; Banwell HA
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e10253. PubMed ID: 33505779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intra-rater reliability and agreement of various methods of measurement to assess dorsiflexion in the Weight Bearing Dorsiflexion Lunge Test (WBLT) among female athletes.
    Langarika-Rocafort A; Emparanza JI; Aramendi JF; Castellano J; Calleja-González J
    Phys Ther Sport; 2017 Jan; 23():37-44. PubMed ID: 27665249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and reliability of a new ankle dorsiflexion measurement device.
    Gatt A; Chockalingam N
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Aug; 37(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 23211471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of the weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion measurement using a smartphone goniometer application.
    Zunko H; Vauhnik R
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11977. PubMed ID: 34616594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A weightbearing technique for the measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion with the knee extended is reliable.
    Munteanu SE; Strawhorn AB; Landorf KB; Bird AR; Murley GS
    J Sci Med Sport; 2009 Jan; 12(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 17888733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and smallest real difference of the ankle lunge test post ankle fracture.
    Simondson D; Brock K; Cotton S
    Man Ther; 2012 Feb; 17(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 21959254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of three measures of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion.
    Konor MM; Morton S; Eckerson JM; Grindstaff TL
    Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2012 Jun; 7(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 22666642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The TiltMeter app is a novel and accurate measurement tool for the weight bearing lunge test.
    Williams CM; Caserta AJ; Haines TP
    J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Sep; 16(5):392-5. PubMed ID: 23491138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Dorsiflexion Range of Motion Screen: A Validation Study.
    Plisky PJ; Bullock GS; Garner MB; Ricard R; Hayden J; Huebner B; Schwartzkopf-Phifer K; Kiesel K
    Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2021 Apr; 16(2):306-311. PubMed ID: 33842026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of clinical outcome measures to evaluate ankle range of motion during the weight-bearing lunge test.
    Hall EA; Docherty CL
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jul; 20(7):618-621. PubMed ID: 28108266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Weight bearing versus non-weight bearing ankle dorsiflexion measurement in people with diabetes: a cross sectional study.
    Searle A; Spink MJ; Chuter VH
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Jun; 19(1):183. PubMed ID: 29859538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The validity and reliability of a new instrumented device for measuring ankle dorsiflexion range of motion.
    Calatayud J; Martin F; Gargallo P; García-Redondo J; Colado JC; Marín PJ
    Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2015 Apr; 10(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 25883868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. RELIABILITY OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL VIDEO-BASED RUNNING GAIT ANALYSIS.
    Reinking MF; Dugan L; Ripple N; Schleper K; Scholz H; Spadino J; Stahl C; McPoil TG
    Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2018 Jun; 13(3):453-461. PubMed ID: 30038831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter-rater reliability and validity of angle measurements using smartphone applications for weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion measurements.
    Awatani T; Enoki T; Morikita I
    Phys Ther Sport; 2018 Nov; 34():113-120. PubMed ID: 30267968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of a new computerized equinometer based on Silfverskiöld test to measure gastrocnemius tightness.
    Martinez L; Lalevée M; Beldame J; L'Hermette M; Brunel H; Dujardin F; Billuart F
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0284279. PubMed ID: 37043480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity and reliability of ankle morphological measurements on computerized tomography-synthesized planar radiographs.
    Kuo CC; Lu HL; Lu TW; Leardini A; Kuo MY; Hsu HC
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Aug; 15(1):92. PubMed ID: 27495933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.