217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11677548)
1. Responsiveness of visual analogue and McGill pain scale measures.
Scrimshaw SV; Maher C
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Oct; 24(8):501-4. PubMed ID: 11677548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of the new Backache Index (BAI) in patients with low back pain.
Farasyn A; Meeusen R
Spine J; 2006; 6(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16934729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.
Walsh TL; Hanscom B; Lurie JD; Weinstein JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 12642770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of internal and external responsiveness of the generic Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) with disease-specific measures in rheumatoid arthritis.
Veehof MM; ten Klooster PM; Taal E; van Riel PL; van de Laar MA
J Rheumatol; 2008 Apr; 35(4):610-7. PubMed ID: 18322989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire as an outcome measure: test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change.
Strand LI; Ljunggren AE; Bogen B; Ask T; Johnsen TB
Eur J Pain; 2008 Oct; 12(7):917-25. PubMed ID: 18289893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting outcome in the surgical treatment of lumbar radiculopathy using the Pain Drawing Score, McGill Short Form Pain Questionnaire, and risk factors including psychosocial issues and axial joint pain.
Voorhies RM; Jiang X; Thomas N
Spine J; 2007; 7(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 17905313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain.
Hägg O; Fritzell P; Nordwall A;
Eur Spine J; 2003 Feb; 12(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 12592542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of intense exercise-based physical therapy program on back pain anticipated before and induced by physical activities.
Rainville J; Hartigan C; Jouve C; Martinez E
Spine J; 2004; 4(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 15016395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain.
Kovacs FM; Abraira V; Royuela A; Corcoll J; Alegre L; Cano A; Muriel A; Zamora J; del Real MT; Gestoso M; Mufraggi N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2915-20. PubMed ID: 18246018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reflexology in the management of low back pain: a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Quinn F; Hughes CM; Baxter GD
Complement Ther Med; 2008 Feb; 16(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18346622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back pain patients in Brazil: which one is the best?
Costa LO; Maher CG; Latimer J; Ferreira PH; Ferreira ML; Pozzi GC; Freitas LM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2459-63. PubMed ID: 18923324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Choice of external criteria in back pain research: Does it matter? Recommendations based on analysis of responsiveness.
Lauridsen HH; Hartvigsen J; Korsholm L; Grunnet-Nilsson N; Manniche C
Pain; 2007 Sep; 131(1-2):112-20. PubMed ID: 17276006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of exercise on adrenocortical responsiveness of patients with chronic low back pain, controlled for psychological strain.
Chatzitheodorou D; Mavromoustakos S; Milioti S
Clin Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 22(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 18390975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relative responsiveness of 3 different types of clinical outcome measures on chiropractic patients with low back pain.
Hare-Mortensen L; Lauridsen H; Grunnet-Nilsson N
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Feb; 29(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 16461167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the daily sleep interference scale among diabetic peripheral neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia patients.
Vernon MK; Brandenburg NA; Alvir JM; Griesing T; Revicki DA
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2008 Jul; 36(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 18411009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Responsiveness of pain and disability measures for chronic whiplash.
Stewart M; Maher CG; Refshauge KM; Bogduk N; Nicholas M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 17334294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What factors influence the measurement properties of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire?
Demoulin C; Ostelo R; Knottnerus JA; Smeets RJ
Eur J Pain; 2010 Feb; 14(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 19443246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analgesic efficacy and safety of tramadol/ acetaminophen combination tablets (Ultracet) in treatment of chronic low back pain: a multicenter, outpatient, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial.
Peloso PM; Fortin L; Beaulieu A; Kamin M; Rosenthal N;
J Rheumatol; 2004 Dec; 31(12):2454-63. PubMed ID: 15570651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale was responsive and showed reasonable interpretability after a multidisciplinary treatment.
Demoulin C; Ostelo R; Knottnerus JA; Smeets RJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1249-55. PubMed ID: 20400266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
