These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11679008)

  • 1. An inappropriate comparison of suction blistering methods.
    Gupta S; Kumar B
    Int J Dermatol; 2001 Jul; 40(7):474. PubMed ID: 11679008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Double syringe blistering by adding a three-way connector.
    Gupta S
    J Dermatolog Treat; 2001 Dec; 12(4):219; author reply 219-20. PubMed ID: 12241632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reassessment of the suction blister model of wound healing: introduction of a new higher pressure device.
    Alexis AF; Wilson DC; Todhunter JA; Stiller MJ
    Int J Dermatol; 1999 Aug; 38(8):613-7. PubMed ID: 10487454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suction blistering as a research and therapeutic tool in dermatology.
    Falabella R
    Int J Dermatol; 2000 Sep; 39(9):670-1. PubMed ID: 11044191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of jaundice and its resolution on wound re-epithelization, skin collagen synthesis, and serum collagen propeptide levels in patients with neoplastic pancreaticobiliary obstruction.
    Koivukangas V; Oikarinen A; Risteli J; Haukipuro K
    J Surg Res; 2005 Apr; 124(2):237-43. PubMed ID: 15820253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repair of dermal-epidermal adherence: a rapid process observed in experiments on blistering with interrupted suction.
    van der Leun JC; Beerens ED; Lowe LB
    J Invest Dermatol; 1974 Nov; 63(5):397-401. PubMed ID: 4436597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Epithelialization and blood flow in suction blister wounds on healthy volunteers.
    Svedman P; Svedman C; Njalsson T
    J Invest Surg; 1991; 4(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 2069928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suction blister induction time: 15 minutes or 150 minutes?
    Gupta S; Kumar B
    Dermatol Surg; 2000 Aug; 26(8):754-6. PubMed ID: 10940062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blistering time as a parameter for the strength of dermoepidermal adhesion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hatje LK; Richter C; Blume-Peytavi U; Kottner J
    Br J Dermatol; 2015 Feb; 172(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 25065915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suction blister lesions and epithelialization monitored by optical coherence tomography.
    Ahlström MG; Gjerdrum LMR; Larsen HF; Fuchs C; Sørensen AL; Forman JL; Ågren MS; Mogensen M
    Skin Res Technol; 2018 Feb; 24(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 28685861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Superficial wounding model for epidermal barrier repair studies: comparison of Erbium:YAG laser and the suction blister method.
    Ferraq Y; Black DR; Theunis J; Mordon S
    Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Sep; 44(7):525-32. PubMed ID: 22865469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterisation of epidermal regeneration in vivo: a 60-day follow-up study.
    Kottner J; Hillmann K; Fimmel S; Seité S; Blume-Peytavi U
    J Wound Care; 2013 Aug; 22(8):395-400. PubMed ID: 23924838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suction blister formation in skin after acute and repeated mast cell degranulation.
    Kaminska R; Naukkarinen A; Horsmanheimo M; Harvima IT
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1999 May; 79(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 10384914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-time imaging of suction blistering in human skin using optical coherence tomography.
    Carvalho JC; Palero JA; Jurna M
    Biomed Opt Express; 2015 Dec; 6(12):4790-5. PubMed ID: 26713194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re-epithelialization rate and protein expression in the suction-induced wound model: comparison between intact blisters, open wounds and calcipotriol-pretreated open wounds.
    Leivo T; Kiistala U; Vesterinen M; Owaribe K; Burgeson RE; Virtanen I; Oikarinen A
    Br J Dermatol; 2000 May; 142(5):991-1002. PubMed ID: 10809861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suction blister model of wound healing.
    Koivukangas V; Oikarinen A
    Methods Mol Med; 2003; 78():255-61. PubMed ID: 12825275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evaluation of subatmospheric pressure and hyperbaric oxygen in ischemic full-thickness wound healing.
    Fabian TS; Kaufman HJ; Lett ED; Thomas JB; Rawl DK; Lewis PL; Summitt JB; Merryman JI; Schaeffer TD; Sargent LA; Burns RP
    Am Surg; 2000 Dec; 66(12):1136-43. PubMed ID: 11149585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A double-blind comparison of adhesive bandages with the use of uniform suction blister wounds.
    Woodley DT; Kim YH
    Arch Dermatol; 1992 Oct; 128(10):1354-7. PubMed ID: 1417023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Autologous suction blister grafting for chronic leg ulcers.
    Costanzo U; Streit M; Braathen LR
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2008 Jan; 22(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 18181967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modified technique of suction blistering for epidermal grafting in vitiligo.
    Gupta S; Shroff S; Gupta S
    Int J Dermatol; 1999 Apr; 38(4):306-9. PubMed ID: 10321951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.