353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11679533)
1. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology.
Bazot M; Cortez A; Darai E; Rouger J; Chopier J; Antoine JM; Uzan S
Hum Reprod; 2001 Nov; 16(11):2427-33. PubMed ID: 11679533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adenomyosis: three-dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and correlation with histology.
Exacoustos C; Brienza L; Di Giovanni A; Szabolcs B; Romanini ME; Zupi E; Arduini D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):471-9. PubMed ID: 21433167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis.
Dueholm M; Lundorf E; Hansen ES; Sørensen JS; Ledertoug S; Olesen F
Fertil Steril; 2001 Sep; 76(3):588-94. PubMed ID: 11532486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosing adenomyosis with MRI: a prospective study revisiting the junctional zone thickness cutoff of 12 mm as a diagnostic marker.
Tellum T; Matic GV; Dormagen JB; Nygaard S; Viktil E; Qvigstad E; Lieng M
Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6971-6981. PubMed ID: 31264010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach.
Chapron C; Vannuccini S; Santulli P; Abrão MS; Carmona F; Fraser IS; Gordts S; Guo SW; Just PA; Noël JC; Pistofidis G; Van den Bosch T; Petraglia F
Hum Reprod Update; 2020 Apr; 26(3):392-411. PubMed ID: 32097456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation.
Reinhold C; McCarthy S; Bret PM; Mehio A; Atri M; Zakarian R; Glaude Y; Liang L; Seymour RJ
Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 8633139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of adenomyosis and myomas of the uterus.
Stamatopoulos CP; Mikos T; Grimbizis GF; Dimitriadis AS; Efstratiou I; Stamatopoulos P; Tarlatzis BC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(5):620-6. PubMed ID: 22935303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Echogenic foci mimicking adenomyosis presumably due to air intravasation into the myometrium during sonohysterography.
Ors F; Lev-Toaff AS; Bergin D
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2007 Mar; 13(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 17354191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis of adenomyosis: histologic correlation with ultrasound targeted biopsies of the uterus.
Luciano DE; Exacoustos C; Albrecht L; LaMonica R; Proffer A; Zupi E; Luciano AA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 24183272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffuse uterine adenomyosis: morphologic criteria and diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal sonography.
Reinhold C; Atri M; Mehio A; Zakarian R; Aldis AE; Bret PM
Radiology; 1995 Dec; 197(3):609-14. PubMed ID: 7480727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging Diagnosis of Adenomyosis.
O'Shea A; Figueiredo G; Lee SI
Semin Reprod Med; 2020 May; 38(2-03):119-128. PubMed ID: 33197946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating between leiomyoma and adenomyosis.
Moghadam R; Lathi RB; Shahmohamady B; Saberi NS; Nezhat CH; Nezhat F; Nezhat C
JSLS; 2006; 10(2):216-9. PubMed ID: 16882423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transvaginal sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of adenomyosis based on histopathologic correlation.
Sun YL; Wang CB; Lee CY; Wun TH; Lin P; Lin YH; Tseng CC; Chen CH; Tseng CJ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 49(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 20466291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two- and three-dimensional ultrasonographic features related to histopathology of the uterine endometrial-myometrial junctional zone.
Rasmussen CK; Hansen ES; Dueholm M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Feb; 98(2):205-214. PubMed ID: 30317553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Myoma Imaging by Gynecologic Surgeons Training in Intraoperative Ultrasound Technique.
Bent RE; Wilson MD; Jacoby VL; Varon S; Parvataneni R; Saberi N; Waetjen LE
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1139-1143. PubMed ID: 30502500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endovaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri: identifying the predictive characteristics.
Brosens JJ; de Souza NM; Barker FG; Paraschos T; Winston RM
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Jun; 102(6):471-4. PubMed ID: 7632639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transvaginal Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for the Evaluation of Benign Uterine Pathologies: A Prospective Pilot Study.
Zhang M; Wasnik AP; Masch WR; Rubin JM; Carlos RC; Quint EH; Maturen KE
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Jan; 38(1):149-155. PubMed ID: 29732594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Question Mark Sign and Transvaginal Ultrasound Uterine Tenderness for the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: A Prospective Validation.
Zannoni L; Ambrosio M; Raimondo D; Arena A; Del Forno S; Borghese G; Paradisi R; Seracchioli R
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Jul; 39(7):1405-1412. PubMed ID: 32030800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Preoperative imaging of deeply infiltrating endometriosis in: Transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopic sonography and magnetic resonance imaging].
Gauche Cazalis C; Koskas M; Martin B; Palazzo L; Madelenat P; Yazbeck C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Nov; 40(11):634-41. PubMed ID: 23123282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of ultrasound signs on two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in prediction of adenomyosis: prospective multicenter study.
Krentel H; Keckstein J; Füger T; Hornung D; Theben J; Salehin D; Buchweitz O; Mueller A; Schäfer SD; Sillem M; Schweppe KW; Tchartchian G; Gilman E; De Wilde RL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Nov; 62(5):739-746. PubMed ID: 36920431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
