These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11679689)

  • 1. Recent trends in Chlamydia trachomatis in the United Kingdom and the potential for national screening.
    Pimenta J; Fenton KA
    Euro Surveill; 2001 May; 6(5):81-4. PubMed ID: 11679689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study.
    Macleod J; Salisbury C; Low N; McCarthy A; Sterne JA; Holloway A; Patel R; Sanford E; Morcom A; Horner P; Davey Smith G; Skidmore S; Herring A; Caul O; Hobbs FD; Egger M
    BMJ; 2005 Apr; 330(7497):940. PubMed ID: 15809231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia in general practice: the experience of health professionals.
    Perkins E; Carlisle C; Jackson N
    Health Soc Care Community; 2003 Jul; 11(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 14629202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Britain launches pilot screening programme for chlamydia.
    Bower H
    BMJ; 1998 May; 316(7143):1479. PubMed ID: 9616020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New report and pilot studies on Chlamydia.
    Commun Dis Rep CDR Wkly; 1998 May; 8(19):167. PubMed ID: 9635337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the impact: the National Chlamydia Screening Programme.
    Anthonisz M
    Br J Nurs; 2009 Feb 26-Mar 11; 18(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 19462588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening for chlamydia: seize the day.
    Randall S; LaMontagne DS
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2005 Apr; 31(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 15921540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postal urine specimens: are they a feasible method for genital chlamydial infection screening?
    Macleod J; Rowsell R; Horner P; Crowley T; Caul EO; Low N; Smith GD
    Br J Gen Pract; 1999 Jun; 49(443):455-8. PubMed ID: 10562745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementing a Chlamydia pilot screening programme.
    Gleave T
    Nurs Times; 2002 Dec 10-16; 98(50):34-7. PubMed ID: 12518550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost effectiveness analysis of a population based screening programme for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.
    Gupta M; Hernon M; Gokhale R; Ghosh AK
    Sex Transm Infect; 2002 Feb; 78(1):76. PubMed ID: 11872877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. British Chief Medical Officer recommendations for genital chlamydial infection screening may not be applicable outside the UK.
    LaMontagne DS; Catchpole M; Fenton K
    J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):210; reply 210-1. PubMed ID: 14738660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Managing genital chlamydia trachomatis infection in Scotland: targeted opportunistic testing or a screening programme?
    Clutterbuck DJ
    Health Bull (Edinb); 2001 Nov; 59(6):396-404. PubMed ID: 12661390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re-infection of Chlamydia trachomatis in patients presenting to the genitourinary medicine clinic in Portsmouth: the chlamydia screening pilot study - three years on.
    Lee VF; Tobin JM; Harindra V
    Int J STD AIDS; 2004 Nov; 15(11):744-6. PubMed ID: 15537461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The first point prevalence study of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in young male inmates in the UK.
    Menon-Johansson AS; Winston A; Matthews G; Portsmouth S; Daniels D
    Int J STD AIDS; 2005 Dec; 16(12):799-801. PubMed ID: 16336761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mass media as a population-level intervention tool for Chlamydia trachomatis screening: report of a pilot study.
    Oh MK; Grimley DM; Merchant JS; Brown PR; Cecil H; Hook EW
    J Adolesc Health; 2002 Jul; 31(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 12090964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chlamydia trachomatis: impact on human reproduction.
    Paavonen J; Eggert-Kruse W
    Hum Reprod Update; 1999; 5(5):433-47. PubMed ID: 10582782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Removing the stigma.
    Kilcoin A
    Nurs Times; 2001 Nov 15-21; 97(46):60-1. PubMed ID: 11966059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening university students for genital chlamydial infection: another lesson to learn.
    Aldeen T; Jacobs J; Powell R
    Sex Health; 2010 Dec; 7(4):491-4. PubMed ID: 21062592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population in Amsterdam. III. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women and the role of reinfection and partner treatment].
    Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; Jager JC; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Nov; 143(47):2383-5. PubMed ID: 10590778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
    Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA; Jager JC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):677-81. PubMed ID: 10321301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.