These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11680102)

  • 61. Real-time signal processing for fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Ibrahimy MI; Ahmed F; Mohd Ali MA; Zahedi E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):258-62. PubMed ID: 12665042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Fetal pulse oximetry and wavelet analysis of the fetal heart rate in the evaluation of abnormal cardiotocography tracings.
    Salamalekis E; Siristatidis C; Vasios G; Saloum J; Giannaris D; Chrelias C; Prentza A; Koutsouris D
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Apr; 32(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 16594915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Linear and nonlinear parameters for the analysis of fetal heart rate signal from cardiotocographic recordings.
    Signorini MG; Magenes G; Cerutti S; Arduini D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Mar; 50(3):365-74. PubMed ID: 12669993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Experience in developing devices for medical use exemplified by the electronic stethophonoendoscope].
    Andreev AA; Leshchinskiĭ LA
    Med Tekh; 1996; (3):13-5. PubMed ID: 8926840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
    Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Antepartum cardiotocography: a study of fetal reactivity in frequency domain.
    Romano M; Bracale M; Cesarelli M; Campanile M; Bifulco P; De Falco M; Sansone M; Di Lieto A
    Comput Biol Med; 2006 Jun; 36(6):619-33. PubMed ID: 16005863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Prenatal identification of CHD murmur using four segment phonocardiographic signal analysis.
    Chourasia J; Chourasia V; Mittra AK
    J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Feb; 41(2):122-130. PubMed ID: 27696921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Linear and nonlinear analysis of heart rate patterns associated with fetal behavioral states in the antepartum period.
    Gonçalves H; Bernardes J; Rocha AP; Ayres-de-Campos D
    Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep; 83(9):585-91. PubMed ID: 17261357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Recording esophageal heart sounds with a catheter-tip contact microphone.
    Geddes LA; Bourland JD; Arriaga E
    Cardiovasc Res Cent Bull; 1974; 13(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 4464032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. S3 detection as a diagnostic and prognostic aid in emergency department patients with acute dyspnea.
    Collins SP; Peacock WF; Lindsell CJ; Clopton P; Diercks DB; Hiestand B; Hogan C; Kontos MC; Mueller C; Nowak R; Chen WJ; Huang CH; Abraham WT; Amsterdam E; Breidthardt T; Daniels L; Hasan A; Hudson M; McCord J; Naz T; Wagoner LE; Maisel A
    Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Jun; 53(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 19232777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. [Research on an adaptive fetal electrocardiograph based on DSP].
    Li Z; Shen H; Mo W
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 25(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 18610612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The computerized fetal heart rate analysis in post-term pregnancy identifies patients at risk for fetal distress in labour.
    Valensise H; Facchinetti F; Vasapollo B; Giannini F; Monte ID; Arduini D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Apr; 125(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 16459010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A new tool for foetal phonocardiography simulation.
    Romano M; Bifulco P; Iuppariello L; Clemente F; D'Addio G; Cesarelli M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():743-7. PubMed ID: 25991252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Design of a novel fuzzy FHR monitor and its applications].
    Hu XX; Li YW; Yuan XF
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 31(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 18161375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Design and preliminary evaluation of a portable device for the measurement of bioimpedance spectroscopy.
    Yang Y; Wang J; Yu G; Niu F; He P
    Physiol Meas; 2006 Dec; 27(12):1293-310. PubMed ID: 17135701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Generalized blind delayed source separation model for online non-invasive twin-fetal sound separation: a phantom study.
    Nigam V; Priemer R
    J Med Syst; 2008 Apr; 32(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 18461816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Differences in foetal heart rate variability from phonocardiography and abdominal electrocardiography.
    Ortiz R; González R; Peñat MA; Carrasco S; Gaitán MJ; Vargas C
    J Med Eng Technol; 2002; 26(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 11924846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A Review of Recent Advances and Future Developments in Fetal Phonocardiography.
    Kahankova R; Mikolasova M; Jaros R; Barnova K; Ladrova M; Martinek R
    IEEE Rev Biomed Eng; 2023; 16():653-671. PubMed ID: 35653442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. [Computerized analysis of phonocardiograms].
    Dudeck J; von Egidy H; Sebald P; Lippold R
    Methods Inf Med Suppl; 1972; 6():189-96. PubMed ID: 4536523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A comparative study of single-channel signal processing methods in fetal phonocardiography.
    Barnova K; Kahankova R; Jaros R; Litschmannova M; Martinek R
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0269884. PubMed ID: 35984866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.