128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11680762)
1. Statistical analysis of regulatory ecotoxicity tests.
Isnard P; Flammarion P; Roman G; Babut M; Bastien P; Bintein S; Esserméant L; Férard JF; Gallotti-Schmitt S; Saouter E; Saroli M; Thiébaud H; Tomassone R; Vindimian E
Chemosphere; 2001 Nov; 45(4-5):659-69. PubMed ID: 11680762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation and comparison of the relationship between NOEC and EC10 or EC20 values in chronic Daphnia toxicity testing.
Beasley A; Belanger SE; Brill JL; Otter RR
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Oct; 34(10):2378-84. PubMed ID: 26033640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Making sense of ecotoxicological test results: towards application of process-based models.
Jager T; Heugens EH; Kooijman SA
Ecotoxicology; 2006 Apr; 15(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 16739032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does the Choice of NOEC or EC10 Affect the Hazardous Concentration for 5% of the Species?
Iwasaki Y; Kotani K; Kashiwada S; Masunaga S
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 49(15):9326-30. PubMed ID: 26167813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new perspective on the Dunnett procedure: filling the gap between NOEC/LOEC and ECx concepts.
Delignette-Muller ML; Forfait C; Billoir E; Charles S
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Dec; 30(12):2888-91. PubMed ID: 21932292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relative robustness of NOEC and ECx against large uncertainties in data.
Tanaka Y; Nakamura K; Yokomizo H
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206901. PubMed ID: 30485303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Time to get off the fence: the need for definitive international guidance on statistical analysis of ecotoxicity data.
van Dam RA; Harford AJ; Warne MS
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):242-5. PubMed ID: 22308052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing ecotoxicological effect concentrations of chemicals established in multi-species vs. single-species toxicity test systems.
De Laender F; De Schamphelaere KA; Vanrolleghem PA; Janssen CR
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 18774172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Four selected high molecular weight heterocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Ecotoxicological hazard assessment, environmental relevance and regulatory needs under REACH.
Brendel S; Polleichtner C; Behnke A; Jessel S; Hassold E; Jennemann C; Einhenkel-Arle D; Seidel A
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2018 Nov; 163():340-348. PubMed ID: 30059878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the ECx a legitimate surrogate for a NOEC?
Fox DR
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Apr; 5(2):351-3. PubMed ID: 19645096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of demographic toxicity through the double bootstrap.
Grist EP; Crane M; Jones C; Whitehouse P
Water Res; 2003 Feb; 37(3):618-26. PubMed ID: 12688696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of an ecosystem modelling approach as a tool for ecological effect assessments.
De Laender F; De Schamphelaere KA; Vanrolleghem PA; Janssen CR
Chemosphere; 2008 Mar; 71(3):529-45. PubMed ID: 18031787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental properties and aquatic hazard assessment of anionic surfactants: physico-chemical, environmental fate and ecotoxicity properties.
Könnecker G; Regelmann J; Belanger S; Gamon K; Sedlak R
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2011 Sep; 74(6):1445-60. PubMed ID: 21550112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical results and implications of the enchytraeid reproduction ringtest.
Weyers A; Römbke J; Moser T; Ratte HT
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 May; 36(10):2116-21. PubMed ID: 12038819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sources and implications of variability in sensitivity to chemicals for ecotoxicological risk assessment.
Forbes VE
Arch Toxicol Suppl; 1998; 20():407-18. PubMed ID: 9442312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of dinoseb on the life cycle of Daphnia magna: modeling survival time and a proposal for an alternative to the no-observed-effect concentration.
Chèvre N; Becker-van SK; Tarradellas J; Brazzale AR; Behra R; Guettinger H
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Apr; 21(4):828-33. PubMed ID: 11951958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A strategy to reduce the numbers of fish used in acute ecotoxicity testing of pharmaceuticals.
Hutchinson TH; Barrett S; Buzby M; Constable D; Hartmann A; Hayes E; Huggett D; Laenge R; Lillicrap AD; Straub JO; Thompson RS
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Dec; 22(12):3031-6. PubMed ID: 14713046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The drive to ban the NOEC/LOEC in favor of ECx is misguided and misinformed.
Green JW; Springer TA; Staveley JP
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 22991182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical cautions when estimating DEBtox parameters.
Billoir E; Delignette-Muller ML; Péry AR; Geffard O; Charles S
J Theor Biol; 2008 Sep; 254(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 18571678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of PNEC values: extrapolation from Microtox, algae, daphnid, and fish data to HC5.
Garay V; Roman G; Isnard P
Chemosphere; 2000 Feb; 40(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 10665416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
