These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11681388)

  • 1. Psychophysical suppression effects for tonal and speech signals.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2108-19. PubMed ID: 11681388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forward- and simultaneous-masked thresholds in bandlimited maskers in subjects with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1049-57. PubMed ID: 11519573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychophysical suppression measured with bandlimited noise extended below and/or above the signal: effects of age and hearing loss.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1058-66. PubMed ID: 11519574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2897-907. PubMed ID: 12083223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spectral and threshold effects on recognition of speech at higher-than-normal levels.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):310-20. PubMed ID: 16875228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Svec A; Dubno JR; Nelson PB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1336-43. PubMed ID: 25786946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognition of filtered words in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores with and without increases in masking.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):923-33. PubMed ID: 16158648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-tone auditory suppression in younger and older normal-hearing adults and its relationship to speech perception in noise.
    Sommers MS; Gehr SE
    Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 264(1-2):56-62. PubMed ID: 20006694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychophysical suppression as a function of signal frequency: noise and tonal maskers.
    Lee J; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):1013-22. PubMed ID: 9714921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetoencephalographic study on forward suppression by ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural maskers.
    Nishimura T; Uratani Y; Okayasu T; Nakagawa S; Hosoi H
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e66225. PubMed ID: 23762482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Masked thresholds and consonant recognition in low-pass maskers for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2430-41. PubMed ID: 7714260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC; Wojtczak M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2045-64. PubMed ID: 11681384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release.
    Croghan NBH; Smith ZM
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Additivity of masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Oxenham AJ; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1921-34. PubMed ID: 7593916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation.
    Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH; Roush PA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 22237164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.