100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11681484)
1. Conventional and predicted perceptibility curves for contrast-enhanced direct digital intraoral radiographs.
Yoshiura K; Welander U; Shi XQ; Li G; Kawazu T; Tatsumi M; Okamura K; McDavid WD; Kanda S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jul; 30(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 11681484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography.
Yoshiura K; Stamatakis H; Shi XQ; Welander U; McDavid WD; Kristoffersen J; Tronje G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 9693524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.
Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Okamura K; Kanda S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 15314001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and correction for attenuation and visual response.
Li G; Welander U; Yoshiura K; Shi XQ; McDavid WD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):372-8. PubMed ID: 15070839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the image quality of a CCD-based digital intraoral radiography system: application of perceptibility curve test.
Hayakawa Y; Kitagawa H; Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K; Welander U
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2000 Feb; 41(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 11212381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after application of various image processing algorithms.
Alpöz E; Soğur E; Baksi Akdeniz BG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):490-4. PubMed ID: 18033946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of perceptibility curves of direct digital intraoral radiographic systems.
Yoshiura K; Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Shi XQ; Ban S; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Kanda S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jul; 28(4):224-31. PubMed ID: 10455386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A simplified method to obtain perceptibility curves for direct dental digital radiography.
Stamatakis HC; Yoshiura K; Shi XQ; Welander U; McDavid WD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 10522200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptibility curve test for conventional and colour-coded radiographs.
Shi XQ; Li G; Yoshiura K; Welander U
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 15585809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychophysical properties of a new F-speed intraoral film.
Mastoris M; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Tsiklakis K; Papadakis E; Li G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15371315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correction for attenuation and visual response in digital radiography.
Welande U; Yoshiura K; Li G; Sällström P; McDavid WD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 12076052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of bit depth and kVp of digital radiography for detection of subtle differences.
Heo MS; Choi DH; Benavides E; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 19272812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptibility curves for the Digora system.
Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Kawazu T; Tatsumi M; Matsuo T; Kanda S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 May; 32(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 12917286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of psychophysical properties of two intraoral digital sensors on low-contrast perceptibility.
Shi XQ; Benchimol D; Näsström K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130249. PubMed ID: 24170798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution.
Araki K; Endo A; Okano T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 10808219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of psychophysical properties of two intraoral digital sensors on low-contrast perceptibility.
Shi XQ; Benchimol D; Nasstrom K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130249. PubMed ID: 24404600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessments of the physical performance of 2 generations of 2 direct digital intraoral sensors.
Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Oct; 88(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 10519766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure?
Berkhout WE; Beuger DA; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15140814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
