These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Species differences of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: comment on "Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. I. Two stimulus tones" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 413-429 (1997)]. Whitehead ML J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2740-2. PubMed ID: 9604365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of phase velocity in trabecular bone mimicking-phantoms by time domain numerical (EFIT) and analytical multiple scattering approaches. Molero M; Medina L Ultrasonics; 2012 Sep; 52(7):809-14. PubMed ID: 22698989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comment on "Measurement of the frequency dependence of the ultrasonic parametric threshold amplitude for a fluid-filled cavity". Strasberg M J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):1857-9. PubMed ID: 19354359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Ultrasonic properties of biological tissues]. Ueda M Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1986 Aug; 24(4):238-42. PubMed ID: 3537401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Erratum: Numerical simulation of ultrasonic wave propagation for the evaluation of dental implant biomechanical stability [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 4062-4072 (2011)]. Mathieu V; Anagnostou F; Soffer E; Haiat G J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):1048. PubMed ID: 25698038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Model experiment to study sonic boom propagation through turbulence. Part II. Effect of turbulence intensity and propagation distance through turbulence. Lipkens B; Blackstock DT J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Sep; 104(3 Pt 1):1301-9. PubMed ID: 9745733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]