These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11684217)

  • 21. Diffuse and localised visual field defects to automated perimetry in primary open angle glaucoma.
    Mutlukan E
    Eye (Lond); 1995; 9 ( Pt 6)():745-50. PubMed ID: 8849543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual field progression with frequency-doubling matrix perimetry and standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in healthy controls.
    Redmond T; O'Leary N; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; Artes PH; Chauhan BC
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1565-72. PubMed ID: 24177807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Red colour comparison perimetry chart in neuro-ophthalmological examination.
    Mutlukan E; Cullen JF
    Eye (Lond); 1991; 5 ( Pt 3)():352-61. PubMed ID: 1955060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automated suprathreshold screening for glaucoma: the Baltimore Eye Survey.
    Katz J; Tielsch JM; Quigley HA; Javitt J; Witt K; Sommer A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Nov; 34(12):3271-7. PubMed ID: 8225862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Vigabatrin and visual field defects. A Danish material with evaluation of different screening methods].
    Riise P; Fledelius HC; Rogvi-Hansen Bà
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Mar; 165(10):1034-8. PubMed ID: 12645411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rarebit perimetry for bedside testing: comparison with standard automated perimetry.
    Steven Houston SK; Weber ED; Koga SF; Newman SA
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2010 Sep; 30(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 20548245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Topography of the frequency doubling perimetry visual field compared with that of short wavelength and achromatic automated perimetry visual fields.
    Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jan; 90(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16361671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A new perimeter using the preferential looking response to assess peripheral visual fields in young and developmentally delayed children.
    Allen LE; Slater ME; Proffitt RV; Quarton E; Pelah A
    J AAPOS; 2012 Jun; 16(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 22681943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Changes in the static visual field of patients with low and medium myopia].
    Czepita D; Chmielewska I
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2004; 50(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 16871740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry in predicting glaucoma in a population-based study: The Beijing Eye Study.
    Wang YX; Xu L; Zhang RX; Jonas JB
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 125(10):1402-6. PubMed ID: 17923550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating the visual field effects of blepharoptosis using automated static perimetry.
    Meyer DR; Stern JH; Jarvis JM; Lininger LL
    Ophthalmology; 1993 May; 100(5):651-8; discussion 658-9. PubMed ID: 8493006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The detection of glaucomatous visual field defects by oculo-kinetic perimetry: which points are best for screening?
    Damato BE; Ahmed J; Allan D; McClure E; Jay JL
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 6)():727-31. PubMed ID: 2630353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Short-wavelength sensitive visual field loss in patients with clinically significant diabetic macular oedema.
    Hudson C; Flanagan JG; Turner GS; Chen HC; Young LB; McLeod D
    Diabetologia; 1998 Aug; 41(8):918-28. PubMed ID: 9726594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Laser pointer visual field screening.
    Lee MS; Balcer LJ; Volpe NJ; Liu GT; Ying GS; Galetta SL
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 23(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 14663305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry in children with neurodisability or isolated visual pathway lesions: observational cohort study.
    Tailor V; Glaze S; Unwin H; Bowman R; Thompson G; Dahlmann-Noor A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 100(10):1427-32. PubMed ID: 26740608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Conventional techniques of visual field examination Part 2: confrontation visual field testing -- kinetic perimetry].
    Schiefer U; Pätzold J; Dannheim F
    Ophthalmologe; 2005 Aug; 102(8):821-7; quiz 828-9. PubMed ID: 16044280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Confrontation test using Bagolini striated glasses--a new screening method for detection of quandrantanopia and hemianopia].
    Jünemann A
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Jun; 212(6):449-53. PubMed ID: 9715465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.