These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1168443)

  • 1. Method for sampling meat surfaces.
    Yokoya F; Zulzke ML
    Appl Microbiol; 1975 Apr; 29(4):551-2. PubMed ID: 1168443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Studies of different sampling methods for the determination of bacterial counts from frozen broilers.
    Notermans S; Kampelmacher EH; Van Schothorst M
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1975 Oct; 39(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 1238389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation of a new sampling technic for bacteriologic meat inspection].
    Schuler AJ
    Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd; 1979 Jun; 121(6):311-21. PubMed ID: 384513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Experiences of a veterinary meat inspector. II].
    Smit MP
    Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 1997 Jul 15-Aug 1; 122(14-15):402-7. PubMed ID: 9534765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of swabbing and destructive methods for microbiological pig carcass sampling.
    Ghafir Y; Daube G
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Oct; 47(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 19241527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microbiological carcass sampling methods to achieve compliance with 2001/471/EC and new hygiene regulations.
    Byrne B; Dunne G; Lyng J; Bolton DJ
    Res Microbiol; 2005; 156(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 15636754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monitoring beef carcass surface microbial contamination with a luminescence-based bacterial phosphatase assay.
    Kang DH; Siragusa GR
    J Food Prot; 2002 Jan; 65(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 11808806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and practicability of bacteriological monitoring of beef carcass contamination and their rating within a hygiene quality control programme of abattoirs.
    Untermann F; Stephan R; Dura U; Hofer M; Heimann P
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1997 Jan; 34(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 9029256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bacteriological survey of raw beef patties produced at establishments under federal inspection.
    Surkiewicz BF; Harris ME; Elliott RP; Macaluso JF; Strand MM
    Appl Microbiol; 1975 Mar; 29(3):331-4. PubMed ID: 1090254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of ante- and postmortem hide clipping on the microbiological quality and safety and ultimate pH value of beef carcasses in an EC-approved abattoir.
    McCleery DR; Stirling JM; McIvor K; Patterson MF
    J Appl Microbiol; 2008 May; 104(5):1471-9. PubMed ID: 18070033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of current EC meat inspection procedures and some proposed revisions with respect to microbiological safety: a critical review.
    Berends BR; Snijders JM; van Logtestijn JG
    Vet Rec; 1993 Oct; 133(17):411-5. PubMed ID: 8279110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A survey of the hygienic quality of beef and pork carcasses in Norway.
    Johanson L; Underdal B; Grøsland K; Whelehan OP; Roberts TA
    Acta Vet Scand; 1983; 24(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 6869140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Experiences of a veterinary meat inspector. I].
    Smit MP
    Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 1997 Jul 15-Aug 1; 122(14-15):396-401. PubMed ID: 9534764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of microbial counts on beef carcasses by using the moist-swab contact method and secondary tissue removal technique.
    Lazarus CR; Abu-Bakar A; West RL; Oblinger JL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1977 Jan; 33(1):217-8. PubMed ID: 319755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dye reduction method for estimating bacterial counts in ground beef.
    Emswiler BS; Kotula AW; Chesnut CM; Young EP
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1976 Apr; 31(4):618-20. PubMed ID: 944556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of incubation temperature and site of sampling on assessment of the numbers of bacteria on red meat carcasses at commercial abattoirs.
    Roberts TA; MacFie HJ; Hudson WR
    J Hyg (Lond); 1980 Dec; 85(3):371-80. PubMed ID: 7462589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of the development and use of video image analysis (VIA) for beef carcass evaluation as an alternative to the current EUROP system and other subjective systems.
    Craigie CR; Navajas EA; Purchas RW; Maltin CA; Bünger L; Hoskin SO; Ross DW; Morris ST; Roehe R
    Meat Sci; 2012 Dec; 92(4):307-18. PubMed ID: 22726699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Escherichia coli O157 in cattle and sheep at slaughter, on beef and lamb carcasses and in raw beef and lamb products in South Yorkshire, UK.
    Chapman PA; Cerdán Malo AT; Ellin M; Ashton R; Harkin
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2001 Feb; 64(1-2):139-50. PubMed ID: 11252496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of swab and maceration methods for bacterial sampling of pig carcasses.
    Morgan IR; Krautil F; Craven JA
    J Hyg (Lond); 1985 Oct; 95(2):383-90. PubMed ID: 3905957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of six sampling methods for recovery of bacteria from beef carcass surfaces.
    Dorsa WJ; Cutter CN; Siragusa GR
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 1996 Jan; 22(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 8588886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.