These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1168443)
21. A new simple method for microbiological sampling of meat surfaces. Goulet J; Lévesque G; Moreau JR; Roth LA Can J Microbiol; 1983 Jun; 29(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 6883223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Stochastic Model to Assess the Effect of Meat Inspection Practices on the Contamination of the Pig Carcasses. de Freitas Costa E; Corbellini LG; da Silva APSP; Nauta M Risk Anal; 2017 Oct; 37(10):1849-1864. PubMed ID: 27996166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessing the value of bacteriological examination as a diagnostic tool in relation to meat inspection in cattle. Kogka E; Larsen MH; Poulsen MK; Petersen JV; Vester CT; Alban L Int J Food Microbiol; 2021 Jan; 338():108997. PubMed ID: 33290905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of evisceration on visible contamination and the microbiological profile of fresh broiler chicken carcasses using the Nu-Tech Evisceration System or the conventional Streamlined Inspection System. Russell SM; Walker JM Poult Sci; 1997 May; 76(5):780-4. PubMed ID: 9154634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of carcass contamination with E. coli O157 before and after washing with water at abattoirs in Nigeria. Bello M; Lawan MK; Kwaga JK; Raji MA Int J Food Microbiol; 2011 Nov; 150(2-3):184-6. PubMed ID: 21843905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Simultaneous occurrence of selected food-borne bacterial pathogens on bovine hides, carcasses and beef meat. Wieczorek K; Osek J Pol J Vet Sci; 2010; 13(4):645-51. PubMed ID: 21370742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quantification of Bacteria Indicative of Fecal and Environmental Contamination from Hides to Carcasses. Cernicchiaro N; Oliveira ARS; Hoehn A; Cull CA; Noll LW; Shridhar PB; Nagaraja TG; Ives SE; Renter DG; Sanderson MW Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2019 Dec; 16(12):844-855. PubMed ID: 31381377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The relationship between hide cleanliness and bacterial numbers on beef carcasses at a commercial abattoir. McEvoy JM; Doherty AM; Finnerty M; Sheridan JJ; McGuire L; Blair IS; McDowell DA; Harrington D Lett Appl Microbiol; 2000 May; 30(5):390-5. PubMed ID: 10792669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Bacteriological and histological examination of minced meat in butcher's shops (author's transl)]. Borm PJ; Steijaert CE; Rijnberg-De Waal L Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 1980 Jul; 105(13):526-8. PubMed ID: 6996216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quantitative distribution of Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli on beef carcasses and raw beef at retail establishments. Martínez-Chávez L; Cabrera-Diaz E; Pérez-Montaño JA; Garay-Martínez LE; Varela-Hernández JJ; Castillo A; Lucia L; Ávila-Novoa MG; Cardona-López MA; Gutiérrez-González P; Martínez-Gonzáles NE Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Oct; 210():149-55. PubMed ID: 26125489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A minimal apparatus method for counting bacteria: comparison with reference method in surveying beef carcasses at three commercial abattoirs. Hudson WR; Roberts TA; Whelehan OP J Hyg (Lond); 1983 Dec; 91(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 6363526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. EVALUATION OF THE EXTRACT-RELEASE VOLUME PHENOMENON AS A RAPID TEST FOR DETECTING SPOILAGE IN BEEF. JAY JM; KONTOU KS Appl Microbiol; 1964 Jul; 12(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 14201094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bacteriological status of beef carcasses at a commercial abattoir before and after slaughterline improvements. Hudson WR; Roberts TA; Whelehan OP Epidemiol Infect; 1987 Feb; 98(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 3556439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of aerial counts at different sites in beef and sheep abattoirs and the relationship between aerial and beef carcass contamination. Okraszska-Lasica W; Bolton DJ; Sheridan JJ; McDowell DA Food Microbiol; 2012 Dec; 32(2):325-31. PubMed ID: 22986197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Excision vs sponge swabbing - a comparison of methods for the microbiological sampling of beef, pork and lamb carcasses. Pearce RA; Bolton DJ J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 98(4):896-900. PubMed ID: 15752336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Colony count and LPS content of gram-negative bacteria in cold storage foods and water]. Weber-Frick C; Schmidt-Lorenz W Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med; 1989 Feb; 187(3):181-208. PubMed ID: 2494814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predictability of lean product, bone, and fat trim in beef carcasses from Costa Rica. Huerta-Leidenz N; Atencio-Valladares O; Rodriguez J; Jerez-Timaure N; Vargas G; Rodas-González A Meat Sci; 2018 Sep; 143():223-229. PubMed ID: 29803132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of meat quality properties and development of a palatability prediction model for Korean Hanwoo steer beef. Cho SH; Kim J; Park BY; Seong PN; Kang GH; Kim JH; Jung SG; Im SK; Kim DH Meat Sci; 2010 Sep; 86(1):236-42. PubMed ID: 20584575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of the adequacy of cleaning of equipment used for breaking beef carcasses. Gill CO; Badoni M; McGinnis JC Int J Food Microbiol; 1999 Jan; 46(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 10050680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]