464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11686171)
21. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails.
Curran M
Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Baby Doe's new guardians: federal policy brings nontreatment decisions out of hiding.
Born MA
KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11651897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Severely disabled newborns: to live or let die?
Jackson CC
J Leg Med; 1987 Mar; 8(1):135-76. PubMed ID: 11644153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Balancing wishes with wisdom: sustaining infant life.
Wakefield-Fisher M
Nurs Health Care; 1987 Nov; 8(9):517-20. PubMed ID: 11644099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Confusion over the language of the Baby Doe regulations.
Bermel J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Dec; 16(6):2. PubMed ID: 11643944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. 'Infant Doe': a hospital ethics committee can help.
Capron AM
Washington Post; 1983 Apr; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it?
Clark FI
Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Medical ethics in life and death.
Thompson R
Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A question of "equal justice under law.
Erlenborn JN
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1982 May; 128(66):E2489-90. PubMed ID: 11651737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The "Baby Doe" legislation: its rise and fall.
Moss K
Policy Stud J; 1987 Jun; 15(4):629-51. PubMed ID: 11651898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Ethics committee guidelines issued.
Krieger L
Am Med News; 1984 May; 27(18):1, 34. PubMed ID: 11646386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Baby Doe's rights.
Hentoff N
Washington Post; 1984 Feb; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives.
Ciulla JB
Psychol Today; 1987 Jan; 21(1):70-71, 74-75. PubMed ID: 11658812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Baby Doe and local option.
Hentoff N
Washington Post; 1984 Jun; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The ideal of community in the work of the President's Commission.
Burt RA
Cardozo Law Rev; 1984; 6(2):267-86. PubMed ID: 11651800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns.
Fost N
Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 11644122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe.
Drinan RF
America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Health care groups favor local 'Baby Doe' review.
Med World News; 1983 Sep; 24(18):9. PubMed ID: 11645497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts.
Rhoden NK
South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. 'Baby Doe' compromise approved.
Med World News; 1984 Oct; 25(19):14. PubMed ID: 11645529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
