These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11686181)
21. Rights of institutionalized mental patients: issues, implications, and proposed guidelines. Wildgen JS Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):63-85. PubMed ID: 11663733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. O'Connor v. Donaldson. 26 Jun 1975. U.S. Supreme Court U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1975; 422():563-89. PubMed ID: 12038358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill. Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom. Concemi M Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The right to treatment and the psychiatric establishment. Stone AA Psychiatr Ann; 1974 Sep; 4(9):21-23+. PubMed ID: 11662954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A new right to treatment. Fremouw WJ J Psychiatry Law; 1974; 2(1):7-32. PubMed ID: 11664337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Civil commitment and the right to treatment. Kelly DS LA Law Rev; 1975; 35(2):563-9. PubMed ID: 11664468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Postcommitment: an analysis and reevaluation of the right to treatment. Foianini RA Notre Dame Lawyer; 1975 Dec; 51(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 11664723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Constitutional law--the rights of involuntarily committed mentally retarded persons under the Fourteenth Amendment: Youngberg v. Romeo. Smith GG Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):451-66. PubMed ID: 12083080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure? Miller HL Public Interest; 1977; (46):. PubMed ID: 11664773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The Minnesota Commitment Act of 1982: summary and analysis. Janus ES; Wolfson RM Hamline Law Rev; 1983 Feb; 6(1):41-94. PubMed ID: 11658497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process and the involuntarily civilly committed mental patient. Wold SM Tulsa Law J; 1976; 11(4):604-14. PubMed ID: 11664640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Open Sesame: the Constitution and mental institutions. Trotter RJ Sci News; 1975 Jul; 108(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 11664469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Youngberg v. Romeo: the right to treatment dilemma and the mentally retarded. Gallo LV Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):179-213. PubMed ID: 11658597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Voluntarily confined mental retardates: the right to treatment vs. the right to protection from harm. Barshefsky C; Liebenberg R Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1974; 23(4):787-805. PubMed ID: 11664363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment. Grant GM Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The role of the court as mental health laws change. Flaschner FN Ill Bar J; 1973 Nov; 62(3):128-35. PubMed ID: 11664277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Relief for the civilly committed: a constitutional right to treatment. Stage GL KY Law J; 1974-1975; 63(2):469-89. PubMed ID: 11664473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question. Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]