These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11686181)
61. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients. Belzer I UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Mental commitment cases of the 1971-72 Supreme Court term. Wing KR; Carman R Clgh Rev; 1973 Mar; 6(11):659-62. PubMed ID: 11664360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Wyatt v. Stickney: rights of the committed. Prigmore CS; Davis PR Soc Work; 1973 Jul; 18(4):10-8. PubMed ID: 11662933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Reflections on the right to treatment. Perla GJ New Engl Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):231-50. PubMed ID: 11660953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Psychiatric hospitalization and the Constitution: some observation on emerging trends. Reisner R Univ Ill Law Forum; 1973; 1973(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 11664295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. The significance for psychology of O'Connor v. Donaldson. Bernard JL Am Psychol; 1977 Dec; 32(12):1085-8. PubMed ID: 596714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Rights of involuntarily committed mental patients--freedom or treatment? Howard SW Univ San Fernando Valley Law Review; 1975; 4(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 11662235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Civil commitment in Alabama. Segall RD Ala Law Rev; 1977; 26(1):215-71. PubMed ID: 11664721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption? Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Postadmission due process for mentally ill and mentally retarded children after Parham v. J.R. and Secretary of Public Welfare v. Institutionalized Juveniles. Joseph BC Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1979; 29(1):129-57. PubMed ID: 11665106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Protecting the rights of the mentally handicapped through the courts. Marker GR Child Care Q; 1973; 2(3):204-13. PubMed ID: 11662957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Civil commitment of the mentally ill in California: the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act. Hart MA Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 7(1):93-136. PubMed ID: 11664312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Adequate psychiatric treatment--a constitutional right? St. Thomas More Institute for Legal Research Cathol Lawyer; 1973; 19(4):322-45. PubMed ID: 11663404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Civil commitment: recognition of patients' right to treatment. Wash Univ Law Q; 1974; 1974(4):787-800. PubMed ID: 11664553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Constitutional law--right to liberty--involuntary confinement of mental patients. Tenn Law Rev; 1976; 43(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 11664691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. The right to protection from harm: legal justice for the mentally retarded? Albany Law Rev; 1974; 38(3):540-56. PubMed ID: 11664378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Psychosurgery: the rights of patients. Plamondon AL Loyola Law Rev; 1977; 23(4):1007-28. PubMed ID: 11664912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment. Johnson RM; Wehrle-Einhorn RJ Univ Kans Law Rev; 1974; 23(1):188-205. PubMed ID: 11664536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]