These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11686631)
21. The cross-correlation and phase-difference methods are not equivalent under noninvasive estimation of the motor unit propagation velocity. Arabadzhiev TI; Dimitrov GV; Dimitrova NA J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2004 Jun; 14(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 15094143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Single fiber macro versus concentric trigger macro EMG: a comparison of methods. Nix WA; Scherer A Muscle Nerve; 1992 Feb; 15(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 1549140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Tri-polar concentric ring electrode development for laplacian electroencephalography. Besio WG; Koka K; Aakula R; Dai W IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):926-33. PubMed ID: 16686415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Two-dimensional spatial distribution of surface mechanomyographical response to single motor unit activity. Cescon C; Madeleine P; Graven-Nielsen T; Merletti R; Farina D J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Jan; 159(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 16876257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Anatomical and technical considerations in surface electromyography. Ferdjallah M; Wertsch JJ Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 1998 Nov; 9(4):925-31. PubMed ID: 9894103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The synthesis of EMG signals based on considerations of signal spectra. Gammans P; Qin SF; Wright DK Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():187-92. PubMed ID: 12724892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of the EMG amplifier filter settings on the motor unit action potential parameters recorded with concentric and monopolar needles. Chu J; Chan RC; Bruyninckx F Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Dec; 26(8):627-39. PubMed ID: 3830043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Methodology and diagnostic potentialities of macro-EMG. I. Methodology]. Nix WA; Pfeifer B; Vogt T EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1990 Mar; 21(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 2110888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of changes in intracellular action potential on potentials recorded by single-fiber, macro, and belly-tendon electrodes. Arabadzhiev TI; Dimitrov GV; Chakarov VE; Dimitrov AG; Dimitrova NA Muscle Nerve; 2008 Jun; 37(6):700-12. PubMed ID: 18506714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Using two-dimensional spatial information in decomposition of surface EMG signals. Kleine BU; van Dijk JP; Lapatki BG; Zwarts MJ; Stegeman DF J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Oct; 17(5):535-48. PubMed ID: 16904342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis. Datta A; Elwassif M; Battaglia F; Bikson M J Neural Eng; 2008 Jun; 5(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 18441418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Adaptive fuzzy k-NN classifier for EMG signal decomposition. Rasheed S; Stashuk D; Kamel M Med Eng Phys; 2006 Sep; 28(7):694-709. PubMed ID: 16406673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The contribution of motor unit pairs to the correlation functions computed from surface myoelectric signals. González-Cueto JA; Erim Z IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Nov; 52(11):1846-50. PubMed ID: 16285388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stimulation artifact in surface EMG signal: effect of the stimulation waveform, detection system, and current amplitude using hybrid stimulation technique. Mandrile F; Farina D; Pozzo M; Merletti R IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Dec; 11(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 14960117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The spatial integration effect of surface electrode detecting myoelectric signal. Helal JN; Bouissou P IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Nov; 39(11):1161-7. PubMed ID: 1487279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The presence of unknown layer of skin and fat is an obstacle to a correct estimation of the motor unit size from surface detected potentials. Dimitrov GV; Disselhorst-Klug C; Dimitrova NA; Trachterna A; Rau G Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jun; 42(4):231-41. PubMed ID: 12056338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Modeling of muscle motor unit innervation process correlation and common drive. Jiang N; Parker PA; Englehart KB IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug; 53(8):1605-14. PubMed ID: 16916095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The application of independent component analysis to the multi-channel surface electromyographic signals for separation of motor unit action potential trains: part I-measuring techniques. Nakamura H; Yoshida M; Kotani M; Akazawa K; Moritani T J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2004 Aug; 14(4):423-32. PubMed ID: 15165592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]