These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11686652)

  • 1. Can malingering be identified with the judgment of line orientation test?
    Iverson GL
    Appl Neuropsychol; 2001; 8(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 11686652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting exaggeration and malingering with the trail making test.
    Iverson GL; Lange RT; Green P; Franzen MD
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2002 Aug; 16(3):398-406. PubMed ID: 12607151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Malingering and mild brain injury: how low is too low.
    Meyers JE; Galinsky AM; Volbrecht M
    Appl Neuropsychol; 1999; 6(4):208-16. PubMed ID: 10635435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Embedded assessment of validity using the continuous visual memory test in patients with traumatic brain injury.
    Krishnan M; Donders J
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2011 Apr; 26(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 21355004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting malingering in head injury litigation with the Word Memory Test.
    Green P; Iverson GL; Allen L
    Brain Inj; 1999 Oct; 13(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 10576465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of distraction on the Word Memory Test and Test of Memory Malingering performance in patients with a severe brain injury.
    Batt K; Shores EA; Chekaluk E
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2008 Nov; 14(6):1074-80. PubMed ID: 18954488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classification accuracy of multiple visual spatial measures in the detection of suspect effort.
    Whiteside D; Wald D; Busse M
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2011 Feb; 25(2):287-301. PubMed ID: 21331981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury.
    Frederick RI; Bowden SC
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 19333066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spanish normative studies in young adults (NEURONORMA young adults project): norms for the Visual Object and Space Perception Battery and Judgment of Line Orientation tests.
    Calvo L; Casals-Coll M; Sánchez-Benavides G; Quintana M; Manero RM; Rognoni T; Palomo R; Aranciva F; Tamayo F; Peña-Casanova J
    Neurologia; 2013 Apr; 28(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 22652143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of injury severity and cognitive exaggeration on olfactory deficits in head injury compensation claims.
    Green P; Iverson GL
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 11790910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the computerized assessment of response bias in litigating patients with head injuries.
    Green P; Iverson GL
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2001 Dec; 15(4):492-7. PubMed ID: 11935450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting neuropsychological malingering: effects of coaching and information.
    Dunn TM; Shear PK; Howe S; Ris MD
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 Mar; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 14591464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of simulated memory impairment in 6- to 11-year-old children.
    Gunn D; Batchelor J; Jones M
    Child Neuropsychol; 2010; 16(2):105-18. PubMed ID: 20390583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Malingering detection with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in mild traumatic brain injury.
    Greve KW; Heinly MT; Bianchini KJ; Love JM
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Feb; 23(2):343-62. PubMed ID: 18609328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are brain-damaged patients inappropriately labeled as malingering using the 21-item Test and the WMS-R Logical Memory Forced Choice Recognition Test.
    Gontkovsky ST; Souheaver GT
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Oct; 87(2):512-4. PubMed ID: 11086594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. California Verbal Learning Test indicators of suboptimal performance in a sample of head-injury litigants.
    Slick DJ; Iverson GL; Green P
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2000 Oct; 22(5):569-79. PubMed ID: 11094392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting malingering in traumatic brain injury and chronic pain: a comparison of three forced-choice symptom validity tests.
    Greve KW; Ord J; Curtis KL; Bianchini KJ; Brennan A
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2008 Sep; 22(5):896-918. PubMed ID: 18756391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utility of the trail making test in the assessment of malingering in a sample of mild traumatic brain injury litigants.
    O'Bryant SE; Hilsabeck RC; Fisher JM; McCaffrey RJ
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 Feb; 17(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 12854012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of WMT, CARB, and TOMM failure rates in non-head injury disability claimants.
    Gervais RO; Rohling ML; Green P; Ford W
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Jun; 19(4):475-87. PubMed ID: 15163449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Embedded symptom validity tests and overall neuropsychological test performance.
    Meyers JE; Volbrecht M; Axelrod BN; Reinsch-Boothby L
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2011 Feb; 26(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 21242283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.