These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11686828)

  • 1. Tooth substance loss resulting from mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic root instrumentation assessed by liquid scintillation.
    Schmidlin PR; Beuchat M; Busslinger A; Lehmann B; Lutz F
    J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 28(11):1058-66. PubMed ID: 11686828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative in vitro studies of sonic, ultrasonic and reciprocating scaling instruments.
    Jotikasthira NE; Lie T; Leknes KN
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):560-9. PubMed ID: 1447381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument.
    Busslinger A; Lampe K; Beuchat M; Lehmann B
    J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 28(7):642-9. PubMed ID: 11422585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Er:YAG Laser, ultrasonic system, and curette produce different profiles on dentine root surfaces: an in vitro study.
    de Mendonça AC; Máximo MB; Rodrigues JA; Arrais CA; de Freitas PM; Duarte PM
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2008 Apr; 26(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 18307394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro assessment of the dentine lost during instrumentation using the Periosonic system.
    Rees JS; Addy M; Hughes J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 26(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 10048644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Root surface texture after different scaling modalities.
    Jacobson L; Blomlöf J; Lindskog S
    Scand J Dent Res; 1994 Jun; 102(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 8085122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro comparative study of a reciprocating scaler for root surface debridement.
    Lee A; Heasman PA; Kelly PJ
    J Dent; 1996; 24(1-2):81-6. PubMed ID: 8636498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Root surface alterations following manual and mechanical scaling: A comparative study.
    Maritato M; Orazi L; Laurito D; Formisano G; Serra E; Lollobrigida M; Molinari A; De Biase A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 Nov; 16(4):553-558. PubMed ID: 29797806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loss of tooth substance during root planing with various periodontal instruments: an in vitro study.
    Obeid P; Bercy P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2005 Jun; 9(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 15838684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using manual, ultrasonic and rotary instruments: an in vitro study using scanning electron microscopy.
    Marda P; Prakash S; Devaraj CG; Vastardis S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 22945704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Profilometric Analysis of Periodontally Diseased Root Surfaces After Application of Different Instrumentation Tools: An
    Gürsoy H; Tunar OL; Ince Kuka G; Ozkan Karaca E; Kocabaş H; Kuru BE
    Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg; 2020 Mar; 38(3):181-185. PubMed ID: 31944884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro investigation on the loss of root substance in scaling with various instruments.
    Ritz L; Hefti AF; Rateitschak KH
    J Clin Periodontol; 1991 Oct; 18(9):643-7. PubMed ID: 1960232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of the angle of instrumentation of the Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Scaler on root surfaces.
    Oliveira G; Macedo PD; Tsurumaki JN; Sampaio JE; Marcantonio R
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2016 Aug; 14(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 25690687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study.
    Solís Moreno C; Santos A; Nart J; Levi P; Velásquez A; Sanz Moliner J
    J Periodontal Res; 2012 Oct; 47(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 22494068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study on the effect of ultrasonic instruments on the root surface in vivo.
    Santos FA; Pochapski MT; Leal PC; Gimenes-Sakima PP; Marcantonio E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2008 Jun; 12(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 18060565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A scanning electron micrographical study of root surfaces and subgingival bacteria after hand and ultrasonic instrumentation.
    Garnick JJ; Dent J
    J Periodontol; 1989 Aug; 60(8):441-7. PubMed ID: 2689628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Instrumentation of furcation with modified sonic scaler inserts: a study on manikins (II).
    Kocher T; Tersic-Orth B; Plagmann HC
    J Clin Periodontol; 1998 Jun; 25(6):451-6. PubMed ID: 9667478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the effect on root surfaces of air turbine scalers and ultrasonic instrumentation.
    Lie T; Leknes KN
    J Periodontol; 1985 Sep; 56(9):522-31. PubMed ID: 3897504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth. (I) Residual deposits.
    Kocher T; Langenbeck M; Rühling A; Plagmann HC
    J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 27(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 10783837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.