These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11686828)

  • 21. The diamond-coated sonic scaler tip. Part II: Loss of substance and alteration of root surface texture after different scaling modalities.
    Kocher T; Plagmann HC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Oct; 17(5):484-93. PubMed ID: 9497737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Root surface roughness in response to periodontal instrumentation studied by combined use of microroughness measurements and scanning electron microscopy.
    Meyer K; Lie T
    J Clin Periodontol; 1977 May; 4(2):77-91. PubMed ID: 266507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro study.
    Jepsen S; Ayna M; Hedderich J; Eberhard J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Nov; 31(11):1003-6. PubMed ID: 15491317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Er:YAG laser scaling of diseased root surfaces.
    Frentzen M; Braun A; Aniol D
    J Periodontol; 2002 May; 73(5):524-30. PubMed ID: 12027255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Instrumentation of furcation with modified sonic scaler inserts: study on manikins, part I.
    Kocher T; Gutsche C; Plagmann HC
    J Clin Periodontol; 1998 May; 25(5):388-93. PubMed ID: 9650875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of manual, magnetostrictive and piezoelectric ultrasonic instruments--an in vitro profilometric and SEM study.
    Singh S; Uppoor A; Nayak D
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2012 Feb; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 22437673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Histologic evaluation of three methods of periodontal root surface treatment in humans.
    Crespi R; Barone A; Covani U
    J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):476-81. PubMed ID: 15857084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Root surface smoothness or roughness following open debridement. An in vivo study.
    Schlageter L; Rateitschak-Plüss EM; Schwarz JP
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 May; 23(5):460-4. PubMed ID: 8783052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The nature of root surfaces after curette, cavitron and alpha-sonic instrumentation.
    Van Volkinburg JW; Green E; Armitage GC
    J Periodontal Res; 1976 Nov; 11(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 135833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ultramorphology of the root surface subsequent to hand-ultrasonic simultaneous instrumentation during non-surgical periodontal treatments: an in vitro study.
    Aspriello SD; Piemontese M; Levrini L; Sauro S
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21437474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparative scanning electron microscopy study between the effect of an ultrasonic scaler, reciprocating handpiece, and combined approach on the root surface topography in subgingival debridement.
    Dassatti L; Manicone PF; Lauricella S; Pastorino R; Filetici P; Nicoletti F; D'Addona A
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2020 Aug; 6(4):470-477. PubMed ID: 32573120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Removal of simulated biofilm: an evaluation of the effect on root surfaces roughness after scaling.
    Graetz C; Plaumann A; Wittich R; Springer C; Kahl M; Dörfer CE; El-Sayed KF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 27233902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ultrasonic scaler oscillations and tooth-surface defects.
    Lea SC; Felver B; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Dent Res; 2009 Mar; 88(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 19329455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Calculus removal efficiency and injury potential of vertically oscillating metallic and carbon ultrasonic tips].
    Naef FH; Sener B; Bürgi-Tiedemann C; Schmidlin PR
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2004; 114(11):1116-23. PubMed ID: 15587598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of tip wear of piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers on root surface roughness at different working parameters. A profilometric and atomic force microscopy study.
    Arabaci T; Cicek Y; Dilsiz A; Erdogan İY; Kose O; Kizildağ A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2013 Feb; 11(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 23033943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Ultrasonic root planing. An alternative method versus hand instruments? An in vitro comparison and SEM study].
    van Gogswaardt DC; Behrens VG
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1990; 78(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 2150253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of parameters on root surface roughness following treatment with a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler: an in vitro study.
    Folwaczny M; Merkel U; Mehl A; Hickel R
    J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1221-6. PubMed ID: 15515337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods.
    Vigolo P; Motterle M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 20416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments.
    Mengel R; Buns CE; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9509785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preservation of root cementum: a comparative evaluation of power-driven versus hand instruments.
    Bozbay E; Dominici F; Gokbuget AY; Cintan S; Guida L; Aydin MS; Mariotti A; Pilloni A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 May; 16(2):202-209. PubMed ID: 27860247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.