These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11688542)

  • 1. Revisiting speech interference in classrooms.
    Picard M; Bradley JS
    Audiology; 2001; 40(5):221-44. PubMed ID: 11688542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
    Yang W; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The intelligibility of speech in elementary school classrooms.
    Bradley JS; Sato H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2078-86. PubMed ID: 18397015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting.
    Klatte M; Lachmann T; Meis M
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):270-82. PubMed ID: 20871182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of acoustical conditions for speech communication in working elementary school classrooms.
    Sato H; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2064-77. PubMed ID: 18397014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of room acoustics and sound-field amplification on word recognition performance in young adult listeners in suboptimal listening conditions.
    Larsen JB; Vega A; Ribera JE
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 17(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 18519579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech perception by students with cochlear implants using sound-field systems in classrooms.
    Iglehart F
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 15248805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using personal response systems to assess speech perception within the classroom: an approach to determine the efficacy of sound field amplification in primary school classrooms.
    Vickers DA; Backus BC; Macdonald NK; Rostamzadeh NK; Mason NK; Pandya R; Marriage JE; Mahon MH
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):491-502. PubMed ID: 23340455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustics in educational settings. Subcommittee on Acoustics in Educational Settings of the Bioacoustics Standards and Noise Standards Committee American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
    ASHA Suppl; 1995 Mar; 37(3 Suppl 14):15-9. PubMed ID: 7696882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noise levels in New Zealand junior classrooms: their impact on hearing and teaching.
    Blake P; Busby S
    N Z Med J; 1994 Sep; 107(985):357-8. PubMed ID: 8078623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech Recognition in Nonnative versus Native English-Speaking College Students in a Virtual Classroom.
    Neave-DiToro D; Rubinstein A; Neuman AC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):404-414. PubMed ID: 28534731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments.
    Amlani AM; Rakerd B; Punch JL
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.