These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11688664)

  • 1. Quality of vision with presbyopic contact lens correction: subjective and light sensitivity rating.
    Alongi S; Rolando M; Corallo G; Siniscalchi C; Monaco M; Saccà S; Verrastro G; Menoni S; Ravera GB; Calabria G
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2001 Sep; 239(9):656-63. PubMed ID: 11688664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Bifocal contact lenses as a correction method in presbyopia].
    Avetisov SE; Rybakova EG; Egorova GB; Churkina MN; Borodina NV; Boev VI
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2003; 119(4):28-31. PubMed ID: 12934502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual performance of a multi-zone bifocal and a progressive multifocal contact lens.
    Guillon M; Maissa C; Cooper P; Girard-Claudon K; Poling TR
    CLAO J; 2002 Apr; 28(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 12054378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical experience with the SimulVue soft bifocal contact lens.
    Bierly JR; Furgason TG; Litteral G; VanMeter WS
    CLAO J; 1995 Apr; 21(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 7796528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of multizone refractive multifocal contact lenses on standard automated perimetry.
    Madrid-Costa D; Ruiz-Alcocer J; García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Sep; 38(5):278-81. PubMed ID: 22878381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast visual acuity with bifocal contact lenses.
    Ueda K; Inagaki Y
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 17496703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting and assessing visual performance with multizone bifocal contact lenses.
    Martin JA; Roorda A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Dec; 80(12):812-9. PubMed ID: 14688544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Through-focus optical characteristics of monofocal and bifocal soft contact lenses across the peripheral visual field.
    Ji Q; Yoo YS; Alam H; Yoon G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 May; 38(3):326-336. PubMed ID: 29691930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is binocular contrast sensitivity at distance compromised with multifocal soft contact lenses used to correct presbyopia?
    Soni PS; Patel R; Carlson RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jul; 80(7):505-14. PubMed ID: 12858086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.
    Situ P; Du Toit R; Fonn D; Simpson T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jul; 29(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12861114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized Crossover Trial of Silicone Hydrogel Presbyopic Contact Lenses.
    Sivardeen A; Laughton D; Wolffsohn JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Feb; 93(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 26704141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative visual performance of three presbyopic contact lens corrections.
    Back A; Grant T; Hine N
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Jun; 69(6):474-80. PubMed ID: 1641231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do small-aperture presbyopic corrections influence the visual field?
    Atchison DA; Blazaki S; Suheimat M; Plainis S; Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jan; 36(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 26769327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of high-order optical aberrations induced by different multifocal contact lens geometries].
    Peyre C; Fumery L; Gatinel D
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2005 Jun; 28(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 16141922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peripheral visual acuity with monovision and other contact lens corrections for presbyopia.
    Collins MJ; Brown B; Verney SJ; Makras M; Bowman KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Jun; 66(6):370-4. PubMed ID: 2771322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contact lens correction of presbyopia.
    Bennett ES
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 May; 91(3):265-78. PubMed ID: 18201225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual performance of four simultaneous-image multifocal contact lenses under dim and glare conditions.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jan; 41(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25230076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative analysis of the visual performance and aberrometric outcomes with a new hybrid and two silicone hydrogel multifocal contact lenses: a pilot study.
    Piñero DP; Carracedo G; Ruiz-Fortes P; Pérez-Cambrodí RJ
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Sep; 98(5):451-8. PubMed ID: 26390908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.