These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11689021)

  • 1. The spatial resolution of visual attention.
    Intriligator J; Cavanagh P
    Cogn Psychol; 2001 Nov; 43(3):171-216. PubMed ID: 11689021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tracking an object through feature space.
    Blaser E; Pylyshyn ZW; Holcombe AO
    Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6809):196-9. PubMed ID: 11089972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The capacity of visual short-term memory within and between hemifields.
    Delvenne JF
    Cognition; 2005 Jul; 96(3):B79-88. PubMed ID: 15996557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of salience in localized attentional interference.
    Mounts JR; Gavett BE
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(13):1575-88. PubMed ID: 15126066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attention modulates perception of transparent motion.
    Felisberti FM; Zanker JM
    Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(19):2587-99. PubMed ID: 16022880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional capacity limit for visual search causes spatial neglect in normal observers.
    Morgan MJ; Solomon JA
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1868-75. PubMed ID: 16430942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attending to multiple visual streams: interactions between location-based and category-based attentional selection.
    Fagioli S; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1628-41. PubMed ID: 18823252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention capacity and task difficulty in visual search.
    Huang L; Pashler H
    Cognition; 2005 Jan; 94(3):B101-11. PubMed ID: 15617666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Action modulates object-based selection.
    Linnell KJ; Humphreys GW; McIntyre DB; Laitinen S; Wing AM
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2268-86. PubMed ID: 15924941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feature-based attention influences contextual interactions during motion repulsion.
    Tzvetanov T; Womelsdorf T; Niebergall R; Treue S
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(21):3651-8. PubMed ID: 16828839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays.
    Pomplun M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1886-900. PubMed ID: 16445960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resolving visual interference during covert spatial orienting: online attentional control through static records of prior visual experience.
    Awh E; Sgarlata AM; Kliestik J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 May; 134(2):192-206. PubMed ID: 15869345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do multielement visual tracking and visual search draw continuously on the same visual attention resources?
    Alvarez GA; Horowitz TS; Arsenio HC; Dimase JS; Wolfe JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):643-67. PubMed ID: 16131240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Seeing fearful body language overcomes attentional deficits in patients with neglect.
    Tamietto M; Geminiani G; Genero R; de Gelder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Mar; 19(3):445-54. PubMed ID: 17335393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Set-size effects for identification versus localization depend on the visual search task.
    Busey T; Palmer J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):790-810. PubMed ID: 18665726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection.
    Theeuwes J; Van der Burg E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1335-51. PubMed ID: 18085947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.