These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11689035)

  • 1. Face recognition in 4- to 7-year-olds: processing of configural, featural, and paraphernalia information.
    Freire A; Lee K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2001 Dec; 80(4):347-71. PubMed ID: 11689035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why 8-year-olds cannot tell the difference between Steve Martin and Paul Newman: factors contributing to the slow development of sensitivity to the spacing of facial features.
    Mondloch CJ; Dobson KS; Parsons J; Maurer D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Oct; 89(2):159-81. PubMed ID: 15388304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity of 4-year-olds to featural and second-order relational changes in face distinctiveness.
    McKone E; Boyer BL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Jun; 94(2):134-62. PubMed ID: 16483596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recognition and sex categorization of adults' and children's faces: examining performance in the absence of sex-stereotyped cues.
    Wild HA; Barrett SE; Spence MJ; O'Toole AJ; Cheng YD; Brooke J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2000 Dec; 77(4):269-91. PubMed ID: 11063629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence of a shift from featural to configural face processing in infancy.
    Schwarzer G; Zauner N; Jovanovic B
    Dev Sci; 2007 Jul; 10(4):452-63. PubMed ID: 17552935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Featural and configural face processing strategies: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Lobmaier JS; Klaver P; Loenneker T; Martin E; Mast FW
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 18303568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The development of face recognition: featural or configurational processing?
    Baenninger M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1994 Jun; 57(3):377-96. PubMed ID: 8027706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring children's face-space: a multidimensional scaling analysis of the mental representation of facial identity.
    Nishimura M; Maurer D; Gao X
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Jul; 103(3):355-75. PubMed ID: 19342062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Four-to-six-year-old children use norm-based coding in face-space.
    Jeffery L; McKone E; Haynes R; Firth E; Pellicano E; Rhodes G
    J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):18. PubMed ID: 20616134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Isolating the special component of face recognition: peripheral identification and a Mooney face.
    McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):181-97. PubMed ID: 14736306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Face recognition memory and configural processing: a developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):487-502. PubMed ID: 15072683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are representations of unfamiliar faces independent of encoding modality?
    Casey SJ; Newell FN
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):506-13. PubMed ID: 16597451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Configural processing and face viewpoint.
    McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):310-27. PubMed ID: 18377173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Children's susceptibility to retroactive interference: the effects of age and degree of learning.
    Lee K; Bussey K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2001 Dec; 80(4):372-91. PubMed ID: 11689036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Holistic face processing is mature at 4 years of age: evidence from the composite face effect.
    de Heering A; Houthuys S; Rossion B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Jan; 96(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 17007869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces.
    Goffaux V; Hault B; Michel C; Vuong QC; Rossion B
    Perception; 2005; 34(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15773608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The recognition of emotional expression in prosopagnosia: decoding whole and part faces.
    Stephan BC; Breen N; Caine D
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2006 Nov; 12(6):884-95. PubMed ID: 17064450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development of facial emotion recognition: the role of configural information.
    Durand K; Gallay M; Seigneuric A; Robichon F; Baudouin JY
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 May; 97(1):14-27. PubMed ID: 17291524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The horizontal and vertical relations in upright faces are transmitted by different spatial frequency ranges.
    Goffaux V
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 18166166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of inversion on 3- to 5-year-olds' recognition of face and nonface visual objects.
    Picozzi M; Cassia VM; Turati C; Vescovo E
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Apr; 102(4):487-502. PubMed ID: 19111316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.