These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11689855)
1. Research tool patents: tips for facing a "pay up now or litigate" ultimatum. Gogoris A; Ancona P Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Nov; 19(11):1075-7. PubMed ID: 11689855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Collaborative research presents special problems for patent seekers. Thorne LW; Ergenzinger ER; Spruill WM Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jul; 22(7):901-2. PubMed ID: 15229550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Protecting rights to early-stage technology. Shuster MJ; Su H; Blaug S Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):701-3. PubMed ID: 12776151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bungled law threatens Italian tech transfer. Meldolesi A Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Nov; 19(11):996-7. PubMed ID: 11689829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Enzo Biochem v. Gen-Probe: complying with the written description requirement under US patent law. Blaug S; Shuster M; Su H Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan; 21(1):97-9. PubMed ID: 12511910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. "Obvious to try": a proper patentability standard in the pharmaceutical arts? Trask AV Fordham Law Rev; 2008 Apr; 76(5):2625-68. PubMed ID: 18546581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Encouraging further innovation: Ariad v. Eli Lilly and the written description requirement. Jakas J Seton Hall Law Rev; 2012; 42(3):1287-36. PubMed ID: 22803220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Super-enzyme patents get their day in court. Cyranoski D Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):767. PubMed ID: 12397315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Science and the law. Working through the patent problem. Walsh JP; Cohen WM; Arora A Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5609):1021. PubMed ID: 12586928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A modest proposal: toward improved access to biotechnology research tools by implementing a broad experimental use exception. Hoffman DC Cornell Law Rev; 2004 May; 89(4):993-1043. PubMed ID: 15174465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The importance of being inventive. Critics claim that patents on genes may lead to very broad monopolies and inhibit further innovation. The European patent system provides efficient legal means to address these issues. Rutz B; Yeats S EMBO Rep; 2004 Feb; 5(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 14755300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. US acts to lengthen term of patents to help biotechnology. Wadman M Nature; 1999 Aug; 400(6745):604. PubMed ID: 10458149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayh-Dole: if we knew then what we know now. Boettiger S; Bennett AB Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Mar; 24(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 16525405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]